Research Article
An Improved Approach of Classical Upper Bound Theory for Stability Analysis of Layered Slopes
Table 2
Comparison of
Ns between researchers and the presented for layered slopes with
of 20° (Example
1).
| m | Source | | 45° | 50° | 55° | 60° | 65° | 70° | 75° | 80° |
| 0.2 | Kumar and Samui [20] | 15.69 | 13.60 | 11.86 | 10.30 | 8.95 | 7.89 | 7.06 | 6.32 | Sun et al. [21] | ― | 13.51 | 11.72 | 10.30 | 9.22 | 8.29 | 7.46 | 6.77 | Present | 15.61 | 13.51 | 11.73 | 10.33 | 9.23 | 8.30 | 7.49 | 6.78 |
| 0.4 | Kumar and Samui [20] | 13.86 | 12.10 | 10.78 | 9.47 | 8.5 | 7.55 | 6.06 | 5.56 | Sun et al. [21] | ― | 12.84 | 11.21 | 9.94 | 8.91 | 7.29 | 6.61 | 5.81 | Present | 15.06 | 12.85 | 11.22 | 9.96 | 8.92 | 8.36 | 7.30 | 6.62 | | Geo-Slope (Morgenstern–Price) | 15.31 | ― | ― | ― | ― | 8.30 | 7.51 | 6.80 |
| 0.6 | Kumar and Samui [20] | 13.26 | 11.78 | 10.48 | 9.22 | 8.25 | 7.31 | 6.6 | 5.95 | Sun et al. [21] | ― | 11.70 | 10.63 | 9.24 | 8.35 | 7.59 | 6.91 | 6.31 | Present | 13.53 | 11.72 | 10.34 | 9.26 | 8.36 | 7.59 | 6.92 | 6.31 |
|
|