Research Article
Experimental Study and Numerical Simulation Analysis on Reinforcement of Mortise-Tenon Joints with Flat Steel Strips
Table 10
Comparison of FEM and experimental results.
| Mortise-tenon type | Reinforcement method | Total energy of FEM | Total energy of experimental | Total energy ratio (%) | Ultimate load capacity of FEM | Ultimate load capacity of experimental | Ultimate load capacity ratio (%) |
| Tou mortise-tenon joints | Reinforced | 3.75 | 5.19 | 72.25 | 2.59 | 3.59 | 72.14 | Unreinforced | 5.46 | 5.5004 | 99.27 | 4.32 | 4.08 | 105.88 |
| Ban mortise-tenon joints | Reinforced | 1.68 | 2.1958 | 76.51 | 0.71 | 0.6 | 118.33 | Unreinforced | 8.87 | 4.0293 | 220.14 | 3.7 | 3.16 | 117.09 |
| Dovetail mortise-tenon joints | Reinforced | 1.76 | 2.37 | 74.26 | 0.63 | 0.44 | 143.18 | Unreinforced | 3.35 | 5.36 | 62.50 | 3.87 | 2.66 | 145.49 |
|
|
Note. Total energy ratio and ultimate load capacity ratio are FEM over experimental.
|