Research Article

Borehole TV Imaging Technology for Horizontal Directional Drilling Based on an Optimization Algorithm for Structural Planes

Table 1

Results of the comparative analysis.

No.Actual attitudeAlgorithm of this studyAlgorithm AAlgorithm B
Key pointsCalculated attitudeKey pointsCalculated attitudeKey pointsCalculated attitude

1289°∠27°P1 (73.12°, 8.516 m)280°∠28°289°∠37°P1 (73.12°, 8.516 m)313°∠68°
P2 (109.69°, 8.568 m)P1 (28.12°, 8.501 m)P2 (109.69°, 8.57 m)
P3 (135.00°, 8.641 m)P2 (208.2°, 8.712 m)P3 (135.00°, 8.64 m)
P4 (168.75°, 8.677 m)

266°∠78°P1 (92.81°, 8.800 m)67°∠79°65°∠82°P1 (92.81°, 8.800 m)79°∠70°
P2 (240.47°, 8.816 m)P1 (120.94°, 8.798 m)P2 (240.47°, 8.816 m)
P3 (282.66°, 8.822 m)P2 (300.94°, 8.819 m)P3 (282.66°, 8.822 m)
P4 (317.81°, 8.824 m)

3206°∠89°P1 (85.78°, 9.077 m)206°∠84°205°∠86°P1 (85.78°, 9.077 m)208°∠89°
P2 (136.41°, 9.073 m)P1 (98.44°, 9.077 m)P2 (136.41°, 9.073 m)
P3 (189.84°, 9.060 m)P2 (278.44°, 9.037 m)P3 (189.84°, 9.060 m)
P4 (271.41°, 9.038 m)

4227°∠45°P1 (0.00°, 9.416 m)221°∠44°216°∠45°P1 (0.00°, 9.416 m)237°∠41°
P2 (87.19°, 9.450 m)P1 (344.53°, 9.407 m)P2 (87.19°, 9.450 m)
P3 (181.41°, 9.492 m)P2 (164.53°, 9.492 m)P3 (181.41°, 9.492 m)
P4 (326.25°, 9.403 m)