Settlement Prediction Based on the Relationship between the Empirical and Analytical Solutions of a Cylindrical Cavity under Undrained Conditions

Table 1

Cases of tunneling and related maximum ground settlement (it should be noted that the model tests in Table 1, cases 2 and 3, are test data and can be performed under drained and undrained conditions).

No	PN^1	EM^2		^3 (m)	(%)	(m)	Reference
1	WB crossrail tunnel beneath hyde park	EPB	0.12	1.12; 1.58; 1.86; 1.95; 2.22; 4.45; 10.31; 15.03	0.9; 1.3; 1.54; 1.61; 1.83; 3.67; 8.5; 12.4	0.04; 0.06; 0.07; 0.07; 0.08; 0.16; 0.38; 0.56	Ieronymaki et al. [55, 56]
2	Model test	EPB	0.31	1.24; 4.79; 5.15; 17.05	1.03; 3.95; 4.25; 14.06	0.40; 1.57; 1.69; 5.60	Hu et al. [57]
3	Model test	—	—	1.60; 1.90; 2.55; 10.91; 17.05	1.32; 1.32; 1.56; 2.10; 9; 14.06	0.21; 0.21; 0.24; 0.34; 1.43; 2.24	Wang et al. [58]

¹PN: project name; ²EM: excavation method. Noted: ³ is negative.