Analyzing the Variances in Perspectives on BIM Implementation among Korea AEC Participants

Table 6

P-value for the Kruskal–Wallis test.

Question and response		Q1	Q2	Q3	Q4	Q5	Q6
Q10: Function of BIM room	(a) Design review	0.414	0.400	0.067	0.540	0.820	0.137
	(b) Coordinate interface	0.658	0.621	0.699	0.149	0.198	0.236
	(c) Quality check	0.156	0.571	0.202	0.776	0.689	0.248
	(d) Simulation	0.188	0.744	0.186	0.625	0.935	0.066
	(e) Preconstruction	0.621	0.306	0.064	0.874	0.725	0.856
	(f) Value engineering	0.270	0.041	0.617	0.316	0.747	0.981
Q11: Devices of BIM room	(a) Interactive whiteboard	0.310	0.359	0.270	0.231	0.928	0.241
	(b) Projector	0.701	0.488	0.169	0.166	0.948	0.558
	(c) High-performance PC	0.597	0.864	0.164	0.704	0.791	0.535
	(d) HMD, joystick for VR	0.161	0.063	0.306	0.445	0.330	0.643
	(e) Video conferencing	0.609	0.721	0.554	0.187	0.284	0.487
Q13: Need for data standard		0.758	0.680	0.490	0.196	0.131	0.359
Q14: CDE platform	(a) Storage; cloud vs. server	0.409	0.601	0.157	0.301	0.604	0.748
	(b) Specialized solution	0.002	0.346	0.003	0.207	0.842	0.608
	(c) Commercial solution	0.772	0.921	0.589	0.682	0.063	0.287
	(d) Wed, mobile accessible	0.045	0.608	0.123	0.176	0.733	0.116
Q15: Important task in collaborative environment	(a) Arrange collaborative task	0.688	0.898	0.388	0.133	0.365	0.892
	(b) Subtask definitions	0.617	0.773	0.642	0.464	0.042	0.343
	(c) Coordinator appointment	0.290	0.650	0.371	0.618	0.150	0.816
	(d) Training coordinator	0.900	0.970	0.459	0.747	0.864	0.867
	(e) Defining participant’s role	0.290	0.281	0.851	0.680	0.265	0.700
	(f) Process improvements	0.821	0.532	0.308	0.727	0.856	0.927
	(g) Attendance at meetings of supervisory	0.112	0.655	0.547	0.702	0.730	0.078
	(h) Guidance revision	0.688	0.234	0.372	0.409	0.444	0.994
Q21: Definitions for collaboration	(a) Organization and roles	0.397	0.460	0.212	0.593	0.215	0.812
	(b) Sub-tasks and procedure	0.355	0.843	0.356	0.615	0.049	0.761
	(c) Establish criterion for competency evaluation	0.220	0.407	0.272	0.720	0.396	0.808
Q23: Need for postexecution review		0.038	0.840	0.017	0.620	0.705	0.841
Q24: Process and criterion	(a) Establish criteria internally for each stage	0.155	0.157	0.311	0.159	0.043	0.699
	(b) Composition of committees	0.496	0.790	0.378	0.573	0.424	0.258
	(c) Outcome-based assessment	0.385	0.758	0.414	0.524	0.221	0.507
	(d) Qualitative evaluation	0.701	0.886	0.742	0.571	0.128	0.259
	(e) Assigning a weighted value by difficulty and importance	0.835	0.966	0.768	0.621	0.269	0.214