Research Article

Response of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) to NPS Fertilizer Rates and Inter-Row Spacing in Kechi District, South Western Ethiopia

Table 3

Main effects of inter-row spacing and NPS fertilizer rate on marketable tuber number/hill, unmarketable tuber number/hill, total tuber number/hill, and average tuber weight/tuber.

TreatmentsMTNUTNTTNAWT(g)

Inter-row spacing (cm)
457.650d2.411a10.061c72.342b
558.789cd2.489a11.278bc72.663b
659.711bc1.539b11.250bc82.061a
7511.744a1.400b13.144a85.559a
85 significance level11.378ab1.567b12.944ab83.456a
LSD (0.05)1.84980.53281.73478.1357

NPS fertilizer rate (kg/ha)
07.680d2.460a10.140b72.288b
508.893cd2.234a11.127ab73.399b
1009.073bcd2.333a11.307ab77.597ab
15010.853abc1.593b12.447a83.215a
20011.627a1.393b13.020a83.493a
250 significance11.00ab1.373b12.373a85.304a
LSD (0.05)2.02640.58361.90038.9122
CV (%)28.1332.4522.1515.39

UMTN = number of unmarketable tubers; MTN = number of marketable tubers; TTN = number of total tubers. AWT = average weight of tuber;  = significant at 5% significance levels;  = significant at 1% significance levels; LSD (0.05) = least significant difference at 5% level; CV= coefficient of variation; means in column followed by the same letters are not significantly different at 5% level of significance.