Research Article

Response of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) to NPS Fertilizer Rates and Inter-Row Spacing in Kechi District, South Western Ethiopia

Table 4

Main effects of inter-row spacing and NPS fertilizer rate on stand count percent, marketable tuber yield/ha, unmarketable tuber yield/ha, and total tuber yield/ha.

TreatmentsSCPMTY (t/ha)UTY (t/ha)TTY (t/ha)

Inter-row spacing (cm)
4590.83338.575b4.113a42.689b
5594.72242.684a3.842a46.526a
6593.33345.084a3.3767b48.462a
7593.61137.492b3.242b40.734b
85 significance level94.722 NS31.7173.235b34.952c
LSD (0.05)NS3.70030.28973.7182

NPS fertilizer rate (kg/ha)
092.00026.442c4.767a31.209c
5091.66730.025c3.693b33.719c
10094.66736.908b3.332c40.239b
15095.0046.303a3.289c49.594a
20095.66748.056a3.089c51.145a
250 significance91.667 NS46.929a3.20150.131a
LSD (0.05)NS4.05350.31744.0731
CV (%)7.1614.9412.1913.70

SCP= stand count percent; UMTY = yield of unmarketable tuber; MTY = yield of marketable tuber; TTY = total tuber yield;  = significant at 1% significance levels; LSD (0.05) = least significant difference at 5% level; CV= coefficient of variation; means in column followed by the same letters are not significantly different at 5% level of significance.