Research Article

Effect of Soil Management Practices on Soil Physico-Chemical Properties: A Case of Wera Sub-Watershed, Southern Ethiopia

Table 4

Effect of soil management practices at different landscape positions on soil chemical properties.

Soil propertiesLandscape positionsSoil management practices
SBDFDNSCOverall

pHUpper (>30%)6.36 ± 0.06b6.35 ± 0.11b5.30 ± 0.10c6.01 ± 0.54C
Middle (15–30%)6.27 ± 0.75b6.41 ± 0.32b6.06 ± 0.09a6.25 ± 0.23B
Lower (<15%)6.81 ± 0.12a6.77 ± 0.36a6.35 ± 0.07b6.65 ± 0.29A
Overall6.48 ± 0.26a6.51 ± 0.32a5.90 ± 0.48b
LSD 5%0.1769

CEC (cmol·kg−1)Upper (>30%)30.40 ± 0.87b21.10 ± 1.27c18.88 ± 2.00c23.46 ± 5.44C
Middle (15–30%)38.53 ± 1.39a28.40 ± 4.95b21.47 ± 3.92d29.47 ± 8.10B
Lower (<15%)40.60 ± 3.07a40.69 ± 8.94a28.24 ± 4.69b36.51 ± 8.14A
Overall36.51 ± 4.98a30.06 ± 10.0b22.86 ± 5.28c
LSD 5%4.1688

OC (%)Upper (>30%)1.39 ± 0.06c1.25 ± 0.15c0.92 ± 0.16b1.18 ± 0.24C
Middle (15–30%)2.42 ± 0.31b1.82 ± 0.21d1.58 ± 0.19d1.94 ± 0.43B
Lower (<15%)2.79 ± 0.07a2.21 ± 0.31b1.81 ± 0.30c2.27 ± 0.48A
Overall2.20 ± 0.65a1.76 ± 0.47b1.44 ± 0.45c
LSD 5%0.2157

TN (%)Upper (>30%)0.29 ± 0.00d0.21 ± 0.02c0.14 ± 0.01b0.22 ± 0.01C
Middle (15–30%)0.32 ± 0.0b0.30 ± 0.00b0.17 ± 0.01a0.26 ± 0.07B
Lower (<15%)0.43 ± 0.03a0.42 ± 0.03a0.26 ± 0.06c0.37 ± 0.10A
Overall0.35 ± 0.07a0.31 ± 0.09b0.19 ± 0.06c
LSD 5%0.0279

Av.P (mg·kg−1)Upper (>30%)6.64 ± 0.13c6.62 ± 0.45c5.54 ± 1.45c6.27 ± 0.94C
Middle (15–30%)14.66 ± 3.64d10.96 ± 1.09a7.17 ± 0.30b10.93 ± 3.76B
Lower (<15%)17.56 ± 1.40b19.60 ± 0.74b11.12 ± 2.90a16.09 ± 3.94A
Overall12.95 ± 5.27a12.4 ± 5.76a7.94 ± 2.63b
LSD 5%1.4833

At , mean values followed by different small letters (a, b, c) along the same rows and capital letters (A, B, C) along the same column differ significantly.