Research Article

Can Soil Compaction Alter Morphophysiological Responses and Soybean Yield under Application of Selective Herbicides?

Table 6

ANOVA summary ( + CV) and mean results for evaluations of plant stand (PS), plant height (PH), number of pods per plant (NPP), thousand-grain mass (TGM), and grain yield (GY) of soybean as a function of soil physical condition and herbicide applications in preemergence.

Sources of variationDF
PS (%)PH (cm)NPP (μd)TGM (g)GY (kg·ha−1)

Block50.23ns5.372.11ns1.09ns0.77ns
Physical condition of the soil (C)110.460.74ns0.01ns49.304.91ns
Herbicides (H)71.96ns1.30ns0.34ns0.68ns1.06ns
C versus H70.84ns1.74ns1.49ns0.27ns0.17ns

CV 1 (%)30.516.937.96.039.5
CV 2 (%)13.69.833.04.914.8

Physical condition of the soil
Compacted75.16 b84.536.4147.4 b3,240.2
Noncompacted92.0 a87.136.2160.7 a3,876.9

TreatmentsDose (g ha−1)

Control76.987.135.8153.13,775.4
Clomazone80078.586.435.3152.73,732.7
Diclosulam29.484.488.937.2153.83,421.5
Flumioxazin6085.381.433156.13,377.9
S-metolachlor1,44089.981.738.5156.93,653.8
[Imazethapyr + flumioxazin][106 + 50]87.587.439.41523,564.6
[Pyroxasulfone + flumioxazin][90 + 60]79.887.836155.23,573.2
[Sulfentrazone + diuron][210 + 420]86.185.735.2152.73,369.2

DF: degree of freedom. ns andNonsignificant and significant by F-test (), respectively. Mean values followed by different uppercase letters, in the same row, and lowercase letters, in the same column, are significantly different by the LSD-Fisher test ().