Can Soil Compaction Alter Morphophysiological Responses and Soybean Yield under Application of Selective Herbicides?
Table 6
ANOVA summary ( + CV) and mean results for evaluations of plant stand (PS), plant height (PH), number of pods per plant (NPP), thousand-grain mass (TGM), and grain yield (GY) of soybean as a function of soil physical condition and herbicide applications in preemergence.
Sources of variation
DF
PS (%)
PH (cm)
NPP (μd)
TGM (g)
GY (kg·ha−1)
Block
5
0.23ns
5.37
2.11ns
1.09ns
0.77ns
Physical condition of the soil (C)
1
10.46
0.74ns
0.01ns
49.30
4.91ns
Herbicides (H)
7
1.96ns
1.30ns
0.34ns
0.68ns
1.06ns
C versus H
7
0.84ns
1.74ns
1.49ns
0.27ns
0.17ns
CV 1 (%)
30.5
16.9
37.9
6.0
39.5
CV 2 (%)
13.6
9.8
33.0
4.9
14.8
Physical condition of the soil
Compacted
75.16 b
84.5
36.4
147.4 b
3,240.2
Noncompacted
92.0 a
87.1
36.2
160.7 a
3,876.9
Treatments
Dose (g ha−1)
Control
76.9
87.1
35.8
153.1
3,775.4
Clomazone
800
78.5
86.4
35.3
152.7
3,732.7
Diclosulam
29.4
84.4
88.9
37.2
153.8
3,421.5
Flumioxazin
60
85.3
81.4
33
156.1
3,377.9
S-metolachlor
1,440
89.9
81.7
38.5
156.9
3,653.8
[Imazethapyr + flumioxazin]
[106 + 50]
87.5
87.4
39.4
152
3,564.6
[Pyroxasulfone + flumioxazin]
[90 + 60]
79.8
87.8
36
155.2
3,573.2
[Sulfentrazone + diuron]
[210 + 420]
86.1
85.7
35.2
152.7
3,369.2
DF: degree of freedom. ns andNonsignificant and significant by F-test (), respectively. Mean values followed by different uppercase letters, in the same row, and lowercase letters, in the same column, are significantly different by the LSD-Fisher test ().