Review Article

Impact of Cluster Thinning on Wine Grape Yield and Fruit Composition: A Review and Meta-Analysis

Table 1

Listing of dependent production and fruit composition parameters, as well as the total number of observations (n) and percentage of significant observations for each parameter by timing of cluster thinning application.

AcronymParameterAlteration by CTBloom (B)Pea-size (PS)Lag phase (LP)Veraison (V)
n sign. (% sign.)bnn sign. (% sign.)nn sign. (% sign.)nn sign. (% sign.)

Production parameters
 YieldYield (kg/vine)Increased400 (0%)1202 (1.67%)320 (0%)960 (0%)
Decreased23 (57.5%)81 (67.5%)24 (75.0%)70 (72.9%)
 LA:YLeaf-area/yield (cm2/g)Increased53 (60.0%)137 (53.8%)1511 (73.3%)2719 (70.4%)
Decreased0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)
 BWBerry weight (g)Increased3714 (37.8%)7819 (24.4%)254 (16.0%)697 (10.1%)
Decreased0 (0%)1 (1.28%)2 (8.00%)6 (8.70%)
Fruit composition parameters
 TSSTotal soluble solids (°Brix)Increased4824 (50.0%)10954 (49.5%)4023 (57.5%)9942 (42.4%)
Decreased1 (2.10%)19 (17.4%)1 (2.50%)2 (2.00%)
 pHpHIncreased3010 (33.3%)8038 (47.5%)3718 (48.6%)7628 (36.8%)
Decreased1 (3.33%)8 (10.0%)1 (2.70%)3 (3.95%)
 TATitratable acidity (g/L)Increased310 (0%)420 (0%)450 (0%)810 (0%)
Decreased11 (35.5%)16 (38.1%)12 (26.6%)26 (32.1%)
 ANT1Total anthocyanins (mg/100 g) berry FWIncreased113 (27.3%)3114 (45.2%)1610 (62.5%)2712 (44.4%)
Decreased0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)
 ANT2Total anthocyanins (mg/L)Increased31 (33.3%)105 (50.0%)40 (0%)2616 (61.5%)
Decreased0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)
 PHE1Total phenolics (mg/100 g) skin FWIncreased11 (100%)32 (66.7%)42 (50.0%)42 (50%)
Decreased0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)
 PHE2Total phenolics (mg/L)Increased75 (71.4%)44 (100%)43 (75.0%)188 (44.4%)
Decreased0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)

aNumber of observations compared between CN and CT at either B, PS, LP, or V. bNumber of observations where CT was significantly larger or smaller () than CN using statistical analysis provided in individual studies.