Research Article
Improved AHP Model and Neural Network for Consumer Finance Credit Risk Assessment
Table 5
Performance comparison of methods in the original data set (unit: %).
| Classifier | Accuracy | Precision | Recall | F1 | AUC |
| Literature [18] | 97.51 ± 0.08 | 98.69 | 64.71 | 78.55 | 92.71 | Literature [19] | 97.35 ± 0.29 | 99.21 | 66.32 | 79.24 | 95.91 | Literature [20] | 93.31 ± 0.17 | 98.55 | 68.75 | 81.28 | 93.03 | Literature [21] | 97.01 ± 0.21 | 98.77 | 63.01 | 76.28 | 91.23 | Proposed | 98.81 ± 0.09 | 99.41 | 84.26 | 92.18 | 98.16 |
|
|