Research Article

Improved AHP Model and Neural Network for Consumer Finance Credit Risk Assessment

Table 5

Performance comparison of methods in the original data set (unit: %).

ClassifierAccuracyPrecisionRecallF1AUC

Literature [18]97.51 ± 0.0898.6964.7178.5592.71
Literature [19]97.35 ± 0.2999.2166.3279.2495.91
Literature [20]93.31 ± 0.1798.5568.7581.2893.03
Literature [21]97.01 ± 0.2198.7763.0176.2891.23
Proposed98.81 ± 0.0999.4184.2692.1898.16