Research Article

Improved AHP Model and Neural Network for Consumer Finance Credit Risk Assessment

Table 6

Performance comparison of methods in the undersampled data set (unit: %).

ClassifierAccuracyPrecisionRecallF1AUC

Literature [18]86.21 ± 0.0994.4971.9880.2193.19
Literature [19]91.81 ± 0.1798.2784.3290.6696.46
Literature [20]82.44 ± 0.1581.1378.8579.9890.66
Literature [21]92.09 ± 0.7797.5883.7790.2996.61
Proposed96.18 ± 0.1297.2194.6395.0999.36