Research Article
Improved AHP Model and Neural Network for Consumer Finance Credit Risk Assessment
Table 6
Performance comparison of methods in the undersampled data set (unit: %).
| Classifier | Accuracy | Precision | Recall | F1 | AUC |
| Literature [18] | 86.21 ± 0.09 | 94.49 | 71.98 | 80.21 | 93.19 | Literature [19] | 91.81 ± 0.17 | 98.27 | 84.32 | 90.66 | 96.46 | Literature [20] | 82.44 ± 0.15 | 81.13 | 78.85 | 79.98 | 90.66 | Literature [21] | 92.09 ± 0.77 | 97.58 | 83.77 | 90.29 | 96.61 | Proposed | 96.18 ± 0.12 | 97.21 | 94.63 | 95.09 | 99.36 |
|
|