Research Article
Numerical Analysis of the Energy Improvement of Plastering Mortars with Phase Change Materials
Table 3
Results of the test performed to the composite mortar with formulation L (PCMM) and comparison to reference mortars (REFM).
| Test parameter | Results | Classification of PCMM/comments | PCMM (LW) | REFM (GP) |
| Dry bulk density kg/m3 | 1170 | 1400 | LW/declared range of values: kg/m3. | Compressive strength N/mm2 | 2.40 | 2.25 | CS I/similar behaviour. | Adhesion N/mm2 and fracture pattern FP (A, B, or C) | 0.35 FP: B | 0.30 FP: B | Similar behaviour. | Capillary water absorption (intended use in external elements) | 4.89 | ≤4.0 | W0/similar behaviour. | Water vapour permeability coefficient () (intended use in external elements) | 5–10 | <15 | EN 1745 [6], Table A.12. | Thermal conductivity W/(m·°C) | 0.29 | 0.61 | Similar behaviour when compared to LW mortars. | Latent heat kJ/kg | ≈25 | — | — | Melting temperature °C | ≈23 | — | — | Melting temperature range °C (90%) | 23–25 | — | — | Specific heat (solid) kJ/(kg·°C) | 1.0 | 1.0 | EN 1745 [6], Table A.12. |
|
|