Research Article
Identifying Key Factors towards Highly Reflective Silver Coatings
Table 4
The average errors of the statistical models for predicting the reflectance of electroplated and physical vapour deposited silvers.
| | 
 |  | Samples | , nm | % | Experimental %
 | Experimental %
 | Model (2) %
 | Error % (2)
 | Model (3) %
 | Error % (3)
 | Model (4) %
 | Error % (4)
 | Model (5) %
 | Error % (5)
 |  | 
 |  | Electroplated Ag number 1 | 14.3 | 0.6 | 83.1 | 83.7 | 76.0 | 8.5 | 81.1 | 3.1 | 88.3 | 6.2 | 92.0 | 9.9 |  | Electroplated Ag number 2 | 19.2 | 1.5 | 74.1 | 76.7 | 68.8 | 7.2 | 74.8 | 2.5 | 76.6 | 3.3 | 82.2 | 7.2 |  | Electroplated Ag number 3 | 29.1 | 2.3 | 65.8 | 72.9 | 53.9 | 18.0 | 61.8 | 15.3 | 67.1 | 2.1 | 74.4 | 2.0 |  | PVD-Ag number 1 | 17.0 | 2.7 | 64.1 | 71.4 | 72.0 | 12.3 | 77.6 | 8.7 | 61.0 | 4.9 | 69.2 | 3.0 |  | PVD-Ag number 2 | 20.3 | 3.5 | 56.4 | 65.9 | 67.1 | 19.1 | 73.3 | 11.3 | 51.2 | 9.2 | 61.1 | 7.3 |  | PVD-Ag number 3 | 26.1 | 4.1 | 47.8 | 58.5 | 58.4 | 22.0 | 65.7 | 12.3 | 43.4 | 9.2 | 54.6 | 6.6 |  | 
 |  | Total average error |  |  |  |  |  | 14.5 |  | 8.9 |  | 5.8 |  | 6.0 |  | 
 | 
 |