Advances in Materials Science and Engineering Assessment of Gamma Radiation Hazards Related to Geologic Materials: Comparison of Results by Field Gamma Spectrometry and Laboratory Methods

<div>Plots for the comparison of estimates of eU (a) and eTh (b) versus K (%) ratios obtained by FGS, XRF, and LGS. The K ratios correspond to K (FGS)/K (XRF) and K (FGS)/K (LGS). The insets show a detail of the whole plots in the range 0–3 of the ratio and 0 to 35 ppm for eU and eTh. No correlation is observed between the data.</div>

Advances in Materials Science and Engineering

fig6

Figure 6

Figure 6: Advances in Materials Science and Engineering Assessment of Gamma Radiation Hazards Related to Geologic Materials: Comparison of Results by Field Gamma Spectrometry and Laboratory Methods 

Figure 6 | Advances in Materials Science and Engineering Assessment of Gamma Radiation Hazards Related to Geologic Materials: Comparison of Results by Field Gamma Spectrometry and Laboratory Methods 