Research Article

Crashworthiness Design and Multiobjective Optimization for Hexagon Honeycomb Structure with Functionally Graded Thickness

Table 3

Optimal thickness value summary by different surrogate models.

Case-SEA (kJ/kg)Surrogate modelTmaxTminnT1T2T3T4T5

A-18.5RBF1.0130.2004.8791.0130.4000.2280.2010.200
RSM1.0970.2306.8831.0970.3500.2380.2310.230
KRG1.1790.2686.0881.1790.4260.2810.2680.268

B-20RBF1.1880.2737.0501.1880.5270.3150.2750.273
RSM1.0980.2353.5701.0980.5440.3080.2410.235
KRG1.2190.2844.2941.2190.5560.3310.2860.284

C-22RBF1.3800.3074.4541.3800.8100.4800.3340.307
RSM1.4980.2672.9661.4980.7910.4250.2870.267
KRG1.2820.3492.8461.2820.7600.4780.3670.349

D-24RBF1.4850.3640.4611.4851.3461.1780.9560.364
RSM1.4990.6761.7861.4991.1680.9150.7450.676
KRG1.4810.6554.9111.4810.8560.6830.6560.655