Research Article

Crashworthiness Design and Multiobjective Optimization for Hexagon Honeycomb Structure with Functionally Graded Thickness

Table 4

Optimal solution under four cases.

Case-SEA (kJ/kg)Surrogate modelSEA (kJ/kg)PCF (kN)
PredictionFEAError (%)PredictionFEAError (%)

A-18.5RBF18.50118.5040.0217.33217.379−0.27
RSM18.49818.646−0.7918.64617.8904.22
KRG18.49319.419−4.7713.46720.888−35.53

B-20RBF20.00720.084−0.3922.64022.836−0.86
RSM20.00419.9080.4822.22522.263−0.17
KRG20.00820.357−1.7117.05223.989−28.92

C-22RBF22.01721.6541.6832.38431.9301.42
RSM21.99921.4842.4032.99132.5711.29
KRG21.99721.4592.5129.90030.638−2.41

D-24RBF24.00024.050−0.2057.86958.033−0.28
RSM23.99723.4412.3755.65557.648−3.46
KRG23.99922.8914.8448.64947.1173.25