Research Article
Crashworthiness Design and Multiobjective Optimization for Hexagon Honeycomb Structure with Functionally Graded Thickness
Table 4
Optimal solution under four cases.
| Case-SEA (kJ/kg) | Surrogate model | SEA (kJ/kg) | PCF (kN) | Prediction | FEA | Error (%) | Prediction | FEA | Error (%) |
| A-18.5 | RBF | 18.501 | 18.504 | −0.02 | 17.332 | 17.379 | −0.27 | RSM | 18.498 | 18.646 | −0.79 | 18.646 | 17.890 | 4.22 | KRG | 18.493 | 19.419 | −4.77 | 13.467 | 20.888 | −35.53 |
| B-20 | RBF | 20.007 | 20.084 | −0.39 | 22.640 | 22.836 | −0.86 | RSM | 20.004 | 19.908 | 0.48 | 22.225 | 22.263 | −0.17 | KRG | 20.008 | 20.357 | −1.71 | 17.052 | 23.989 | −28.92 |
| C-22 | RBF | 22.017 | 21.654 | 1.68 | 32.384 | 31.930 | 1.42 | RSM | 21.999 | 21.484 | 2.40 | 32.991 | 32.571 | 1.29 | KRG | 21.997 | 21.459 | 2.51 | 29.900 | 30.638 | −2.41 |
| D-24 | RBF | 24.000 | 24.050 | −0.20 | 57.869 | 58.033 | −0.28 | RSM | 23.997 | 23.441 | 2.37 | 55.655 | 57.648 | −3.46 | KRG | 23.999 | 22.891 | 4.84 | 48.649 | 47.117 | 3.25 |
|
|