Research Article
Comparison of the Flexural Performance and Behaviour of Fly-Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete Beams Reinforced with CFRP and GFRP Bars
Table 7
Normalised flexural capacity of GFRP-RGPC, CFRP-RGPC, and GFRP-ROPC beams.
| Reference | Beam | ρf | Concrete type | FRP type | Normalised flexural capacity () |
| Current study | G02-GPC50 | 1.39ρfb | GPC | GFRP | 42.44 | C02-GPC50 | 1.40ρfb | GPC | CFRP | 124.71 |
| Maranan et al. [20] | GFRP-RGC-4-12.7 | 1.13% | GPC | GFRP | 47.7 | GFRP-RGC-3-15.9 | 1.18% | GPC | GFRP | 54.3 | GFRP-RGC-2-19.0 | 1.00% | GPC | GFRP | 49.6 |
| Toutanji and Saafi [33] | GB3-1 | 1.10% | OPC | GFRP | 44.6 | GB3-2 | 1.10% | OPC | GFRP | 47.3 |
| Benmokrane and Masmoudi [34] | ISO1 | 1.10% | OPC | GFRP | 35.1 | ISO2 | 1.10% | OPC | GFRP | 36.7 |
| Benmokrane et al. [35] | ISO30-2 | 1.01% | OPC | GFRP | 35.9 |
|
|