Research Article
Influencing Factors and Prediction Model for the Antierosion Performance of Cement-Improved Loess Compacted Using Different Compaction Methods
Table 6
EMLR and ratio of CIL compacted using VVCM and QSCM.
| Cement content (%) | EMLR and ratio of CIL with the following compaction coefficient (%) | 0.92 | 0.95 | 0.97 | | Pj | | | Pj | | | Pj | |
| 2 | 12.6 | 14.0 | 0.90 | 8.3 | 9.9 | 0.84 | 6.1 | 7.4 | 0.82 | 3 | 10.4 | 11.4 | 0.91 | 6.6 | 7.6 | 0.87 | 4.2 | 5.4 | 0.78 | 4 | 8.2 | 9.2 | 0.89 | 4.7 | 5.7 | 0.82 | 2.7 | 3.4 | 0.79 | 6 | 5.8 | 6.6 | 0.88 | 3.0 | 3.6 | 0.83 | 1.9 | 2.3 | 0.83 |
|
|