Research Article
Influencing Factors and Prediction Model for the Antierosion Performance of Cement-Improved Loess Compacted Using Different Compaction Methods
Table 7
Predicted parameters of erosion resistance of CIL.
| | Compaction method | Compaction coefficient | Cement content (%) | Scouring coefficient | R2 |
| | VVCM | 0.92 | 2 | 6.51 | 0.99 | | 3 | 5.36 | 0.99 | | 4 | 4.44 | 0.99 | | 6 | 3.34 | 0.99 | | 0.95 | 2 | 4.32 | 0.99 | | 3 | 3.52 | 0.99 | | 4 | 2.65 | 0.99 | | 6 | 1.73 | 0.99 | | 0.97 | 2 | 3.13 | 0.99 | | 3 | 2.33 | 0.99 | | 4 | 1.55 | 0.99 | | 6 | 1.03 | 0.99 | | QSCM | 0.92 | 2 | 7.12 | 0.99 | | 3 | 5.94 | 0.99 | | 4 | 4.93 | 0.99 | | 6 | 3.70 | 0.99 | | 0.95 | 2 | 5.19 | 0.99 | | 3 | 4.17 | 0.99 | | 4 | 3.17 | 0.99 | | 6 | 2.08 | 0.99 | | 0.97 | 2 | 3.92 | 0.99 | | 3 | 2.99 | 0.99 | | 4 | 1.94 | 0.99 | | 6 | 1.28 | 0.99 |
|
|
