Influencing Factors and Prediction Model for the Antierosion Performance of Cement-Improved Loess Compacted Using Different Compaction Methods

Table 9

The results of the compressive strength of the specimen before and after ERT.

Compaction method	Compaction coefficient	Cement content (%)	qu (MPa)	qE (MPa)	DR (%)
VVCM	0.92	2	1.13	0.77	68.1
		3	1.47	1.11	75.5
		4	1.62	1.27	78.4
		6	2.29	1.79	78.2
	0.95	2	1.53	1.16	75.8
		3	1.82	1.41	77.5
		4	2.22	1.82	82.0
		6	2.68	2.26	89.2
	0.97	2	2.00	1.56	78.0
		3	2.46	1.98	80.5
		4	2.74	2.38	86.9
		6	3.39	2.96	84.4
QSCM	0.92	2	1.03	0.68	66.0
		3	1.30	0.88	67.7
		4	1.49	1.06	71.1
		6	2.03	1.49	73.4
	0.95	2	1.34	0.91	67.9
		3	1.60	1.11	69.4
		4	1.90	1.50	78.9
		6	2.44	1.94	79.5
	0.97	2	1.65	1.12	67.9
		3	2.03	1.62	79.8
		4	2.26	1.83	81.0
		6	2.80	2.30	82.1