[Retracted] Optimizing the Characteristics of the Laser Hardfacing Process Parameters to Maximize the Wear Resistance of Ni-Based Hard-Faced Deposits Using the RSM Technique

Table 4

ANOVA test results for microhardness of the deposit.

Source	Sum of squares (SS)	Degree of freedom	Mean square	F value	value (prob > F)	Whether significant or not
Model	3.334 E + 005	14	23817.52	27.17	<0.0001	Significant
P	41417.04	1	41417.04	47.65	<0.0001
F	1.226 E + 005	1	1.226 E + 5	129.73	<0.0001
T	1751.04	1	1751.04	4.76	0.0118
D	7245.38	1	7245.38	8.46	<0.0001
PF	12265.56	1	12265.56	10.09	<0.0001
PT	23485.56	1	23485.56	32.46	<0.0001
PD	1580.06	1	1580.06	1.09	0.0157
FT	6201.56	1	6201.56	3.00	<0.0001
FD	14220.56	1	14220.56	15.47	<0.0001
TD	10251.56	1	10251.56	11.07	<0.0001
P^2	33380.36	1	33380.36	45.15	<0.0001
F^2	36063.57	1	36063.57	51.57	<0.0001
T^2	2480.86	1	2480.86	1.94	0.0039
D^2	48696.50	1	48696.50	51.89	<0.0001
Residual	3195.42	15	213.03
Lack of fit	2608.08	10	260.81	1.51	0.1959	Not significant
Pure error	587.33	5	117.47	Pred. R^2	0.9529
Cor total	3.366 E + 005	29		Press	15868.32
Std.deviation	14.60			Mean	671.10
R^2	0.9905			C.V %	2.17
Adj. R^2	0.9816			Adeq. Precision	34.478