Research Article
Prediction of Compressive Strength of Geopolymer Concrete Based on Support Vector Machine and Modified Cuckoo Algorithm
Table 9
Comparison of 28d predictive compressive strength for different oxide proportions.
| Serial number | Oxide content (%) | Measured compressive strength value (MPa) | Relative error of traditional CSA prediction (%) | Improve the relative error of CSA prediction (%) |
| 1 | SiO2 | 80.43 | 20 | 10.12 | 2.44 | Al2O3 | 14 | Fe2O3 | 3.57 | CaO | 0.04 |
| 2 | SiO2 | 36.02 | 34 | 11.05 | 5.76 | Al2O3 | 20.58 | Fe2O3 | 15.91 | CaO | 18.75 |
| 3 | SiO2 | 43.7 | 65 | 8.77 | 4.78 | Al2O3 | 21 | Fe2O3 | 22.5 | CaO | 4.85 |
| 4 | SiO2 | 48.21 | 66.1 | 7.66 | 2.32 | Al2O3 | 25.01 | Fe2O3 | 1.3 | CaO | 15.2 |
| 5 | SiO2 | 56.01 | 48.2 | 7.52 | 3.53 | Al2O3 | 29.8 | Fe2O3 | 3.58 | CaO | 2.36 |
| 6 | SiO2 | 50.5 | 69 | 9.04 | 3.36 | Al2O3 | 26.57 | Fe2O3 | 13.77 | CaO | 2.13 |
|
|