Research Article
Rheological Evaluation of Modified Bitumen by EVA and Crumb Rubber Using RSM Optimization
Table 2
Central composite design arrangement and responses.
| Run | Factors | Responses | EVA (%) | CR (%) | Pen | Soft | Temp (/sinδ ≥ 2.2 kPa) | Temp (/sinδ ≤ 5000 kPa) | Creep stiffness | m-Value |
| 1 | 3 | 2 | 54.5 | 58 | 82.00 | 25 | 134.9 | 0.234 | 11 | 5 | 4 | 52 | 67 | 78.00 | 18 | 79.9 | 0.288 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 49 | 72 | 80.00 | 19 | 75.4 | 0.321 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 54 | 64 | 79.00 | 16 | 73.4 | 0.313 | 4 | 7 | 6 | 40 | 80 | 82.00 | 25 | 151.6 | 0.264 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 51 | 72 | 82.00 | 22 | 108.8 | 0.277 | 12 | 5 | 4 | 52 | 67 | 73.15 | 15 | 66.3 | 0.372 | 6 | 7 | 4 | 45 | 74 | 80.00 | 19 | 75.4 | 0.321 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 52 | 67 | 81.00 | 20 | 76.4 | 0.331 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 53.5 | 59 | 79.00 | 18 | 74.4 | 0.311 | 10 | 5 | 4 | 52 | 67 | 80.00 | 19 | 75.4 | 0.321 | 13 | 5 | 4 | 52 | 67 | 82.00 | 23 | 128.0 | 0.281 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50 | 61 | 77.00 | 8 | 62.3 | 0.391 |
|
|