Axial Compressive Behavior of Glass Fiber-Reinforced Hollow Concrete Columns

Jian, Xiangyang; Zhang, Ni; Sun, Qingwei; Liu, Jian

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3315930

Advances in Materials Science and Engineering

On this page

Abstract Introduction Conclusion Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2022 | Article ID 3315930 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3315930

Axial Compressive Behavior of Glass Fiber-Reinforced Hollow Concrete Columns

Xiangyang Jian,¹Ni Zhang,¹Qingwei Sun,¹and Jian Liu²

Academic Editor: Enrico Babilio

Received07 Mar 2022

Revised16 Nov 2022

Accepted28 Nov 2022

Published16 Dec 2022

Abstract

To investigate the axial compression behavior of glass fiber-reinforced polymer tubes filled with reinforced hollow concrete members, the finite element model was established in ABAQUS. The correctness of the finite element model was verified by comparing the simulation results with the existing test results. On this basis, the influence of the main parameters such as GFRP tube wall thickness, filament winding angle, concrete strength grade, and hollow ratio on the axial compression behavior was analyzed. The calculation formula of the bearing capacity under axial compression of the GFRP tube filled with reinforced hollow concrete members was established. The results show that the load and strain curves and failure modes of the model and the established bearing capacity formula are in good agreement with the test results. The axial compression capacity of the hollow members increases with the increase in the thickness of GFRP tube wall thickness, filament winding angle, and concrete strength grade and decreases with the increase in the hollow ratio. The GFRP tube filament winding angle and hollow ratio have significant influence on the bearing capacity of axial compression, followed by the GFRP tube wall thickness and concrete strength grade. The radius ratio of hollow part should be 0.250.5. The axial compression bearing capacity of the hollow members can be compensated by properly increasing the GFRP tube wall thickness, filament winding angle, or concrete strength grade. The research conclusion can provide some reference for the design of the structure.

1. Introduction

Fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) is a new material widely used in civil engineering in recent years [1, 5], among which filament wound pipe is the most representative one. The cost of glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) is lower than that of other FRP materials, which makes the structure have higher economic benefits. The glass fiber-reinforced polymer tube filled with reinforced hollow concrete structure is formed by setting a nonstressed mold in the glass fiber tube, then placing the longitudinal stressed reinforcement between the glass fiber tube and the mold, and finally, and pouring concrete between the glass fiber tube and the mold. The typical section form of the structure is shown in Figure 1. The excellent corrosion resistance of glass fiber tube can protect the internal longitudinal reinforcement and concrete, and the concrete strength is improved due to the restraint effect of glass fiber tube. The concrete is only poured between the glass fiber tube and the mold, which reduces the self-weight of the structure and is convenient for engineering transportation and installation. Due to its excellent performance, the structure has attracted extensive attention in the engineering field. The structure can better meet the needs of today’s engineering structures to withstand the harsh environment and the development requirements of heavy load, light weight, long span, and high strength. Therefore, it has been more and more widely used in underground engineering, civil buildings, bridges, and marine engineering [6, 9].

At present, researchers at home and abroad mainly study the mechanical properties of FRP-reinforced solid concrete structure, such as bending, axial compression, and eccentric compression [10, 23], while there are relatively few studies on the mechanical properties of FRP-reinforced hollow concrete structure [24 and 25]. Due to the limited test components, it is impossible to analyze each influencing factor in detail. In this paper, the axial compression calculation model of FRP-reinforced hollow concrete column is established through ABAQUS finite element analysis software, and the simulation results are compared with the existing test results to verify its correctness. On this basis, the effects of FRP wall thickness, filament winding angle, concrete strength, and void ratio on the axial compression performance of FRP-reinforced hollow concrete columns are analyzed.

2. Establishment of the Finite Element Model

2.1. Constitutive Model of the Glass Fiber Tube

The mechanical properties of the glass fiber tube in the elastic stage are based on the single-layer plate model in ABAQUS. The failure of glass fiber tube adopts the Hashin failure criterion [26]. The mechanical parameters of the glass fiber tube required to define Hashin criterion are obtained from [27], and the specific values are shown in Table 1.

2.2. Constitutive Model of Concrete

The calculation model proposed by Lam and Teng [28] in 2003 is used as the constitutive model of concrete compression zone, as shown in Figure 2.where is the initial elastic modulus of concrete. is the slope of the second curve. is the strain value at the dividing point of two curves. and are the peak strain and stress of concrete under restraint, respectively. and are the peak strain and stress of concrete without restraint, respectively. is the circumferential limit binding force. is the fracture strain in fiber material property test.

The relationship model between stress and fracture energy provided by ABAQUS is used as the constitutive model of concrete in tensile zone to simulate the tensile softening performance of concrete. The tensile softening model of concrete is shown in Figure 3.

2.3. Constitutive Model of Reinforcement

The plastic analysis model provided by ABAQUS is used as the constitutive model of reinforcement, which meets the von Mises yield criterion. In the plastic analysis model, the relationship between uniaxial stress and strain of reinforcement needs to be input. The constitutive model of reinforcement adopts the calculation model proposed by Zhong [29] in 1994, as shown in Figure 4.

And, its relation is shown as follows:where is the yield strength of reinforcement. is the elastic modulus of reinforcement. , , , , , , and .

2.4. Element Type, Contact Surface Relationship, and Loading Mode

The glass fiber tube uses composite shell element, and element type is S4R. The upper and lower end plates of components and concrete use solid element, and element type is C3D8R. The reinforcement uses three-dimensional truss element, and element type is T3D2. Friction contact is defined between glass fiber tube and concrete. The friction coefficient is set to 0.4. The Coulomb friction model is used in tangential direction, and “hard” contact is used in normal direction. The reinforcement is placed into the concrete by using the embedded region command, and the contact between the end plate and the concrete is constrained by binding tie. The displacement loading method is used in the loading process, and the incremental iterative method is used to solve the calculation. The calculation model is shown in Figure 5.

The structural grid division method is adopted to discretize the components. The grid division density is very important to the calculation accuracy. If the grid is too large, the calculation accuracy will be reduced. If the grid is too dense, too much computer resources will be wasted. Therefore, the reasonable grid density should be determined in combination with the grid test.

3. Mechanical Performance Analysis

3.1. Verification of Numerical Simulation Results

In order to verify the correctness of the numerical simulation results, the simulated curve was compared with the load and longitudinal strain curve in the test in [25], as shown in Figure 6. It can be seen from Figure 7that the load and longitudinal strain curve of the numerical simulation results were in good agreement with the test results. It showed that the axial compression model of the FRP-reinforced hollow concrete column established by ABAQUS was correct, and the axial compression performance can be studied by this model.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(g)

3.2. Mechanical Behavior

In order to verify the effectiveness of the axial compression model of glass fiber-reinforced hollow concrete members, its stress mechanism was studied. Taking GRCH6 member in [30] as an example, the whole process of member axial compression failure is studied. And, the failure modes of simulated and tested members were compared, as shown in Figure 8.

(a)

(b)

Through the established axial compression model, the load and longitudinal strain relationship curve of GRCH6 is obtained, as shown in Figure 7. In order to better observe the stress, three characteristic points are taken on the load and longitudinal strain curve. Point A is the end point of the first straight line segment, point B is the starting point of the third linear strengthening segment, and point C is the final failure point of the component. The stress distributions of glass fiber tube, reinforcement, and concrete in axial compression members at three characteristic points are given, respectively, as shown in Figures 9 and 10:(1)Elastic stage OA: When the load is small, the load and longitudinal strain curve in this stage is straight and the axial compression member is in the elastic working stage. Glass fiber tube, reinforcement, and concrete are stressed separately. The transverse deformation of concrete is small, and the glass fiber tube has not yet restrained the internal concrete. At this stage, the stress of the glass fiber tube is evenly distributed along the whole length of the member and the reinforcement has not yet yielded (Point A in Figures 10(b) and 10(c)).(2)Elastoplastic stage AB: With the increasing load, the load and longitudinal strain curve begins to show a curve. With the continuous development of microcracks in concrete, the stiffness of axial compression members decreases. At this stage, the increase of transverse deformation of concrete makes the glass fiber tube under radial compression and circumferential tension. The glass fiber tube has a restraining effect on the internal concrete. Both longitudinal reinforcement and stirrup yield at point B (point B in Figure 10(c)).(3)Strengthen stage BC: With the increase of transverse deformation of concrete, the circumferential stress of glass fiber tube continues to increase. At this stage, the binding force of the glass fiber tube on the internal concrete is gradually strengthened. When point C is reached, the glass fiber tube reaches the ultimate tensile stress at 120240 mm from the upper and lower ends. The core concrete is crushed, and the glass fiber is broken. Finally, the axial compression member is damaged.

(a)

(b)

(c)

From the above analysis, the axial compression model of the FRP-reinforced hollow concrete column established in this paper can simulate the whole process of axial compression failure. Moreover, the failure model obtained by simulation is basically consistent with the tested one.

4. Influence of Design Parameters on Axial Compression Performance

Based on the correctness of the established finite element model, the axial compression performance of glass fiber-reinforced hollow concrete columns is analyzed. The basic parameters are set as follows: The wall thickness of glass fiber tube, the filament winding angle, the inner diameter, the radius of hollow concrete, and concrete strength grade are 5 mm, 70°, 200mm, 50mm, and C50, respectively. When other parameters are the same, the effects of changing the wall thickness, filament winding angle, concrete strength, and void ratio of glass fiber tube are studied.

4.1. Influence of Glass Fiber Tube Wall Thickness

The load and longitudinal strain curves of glass fiber tube-reinforced hollow concrete columns with different glass fiber tube wall thicknesses are shown in Figure 11 when the glass fiber tube wall thicknesses are 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 mm, respectively, and other conditions are the same. It can be seen that the load and longitudinal strain curves are basically the same at the initial stage of load action. When the load reaches 3545% Pu (3mm: 48%, 4mm: 43%, 5mm: 40%, 6mm: 36%, and 7mm: 34%), the change of glass fiber tube wall thickness affects the load and longitudinal strain curve. The load value of the member with large thickness is greater than that of the member with small thickness at the same strain value, and the curve slope of the member with large thickness is greater than that of the member with small thickness. The ultimate bearing capacity of glass fiber tube wall thicknesses 4mm, 5mm, 6mm, and 7mm is 10.5%, 20.6%, 31.0%, and 40.9% higher than that of 3mm, respectively. With the increase of the wall thickness of glass fiber tube, greater lateral force is required for glass fiber fracture. And the restraint of internal concrete is improved; that is, the axial compression bearing capacity increases with the increase of glass fiber tube wall thickness.

4.2. Influence of Filament Winding Angle of the Glass Fiber Tube

When the filament winding angles of the fiber glass tube is 10°, 30°, 50°, 70°, and 90°, respectively, and other conditions are the same, the load and longitudinal strain curves of glass fiber tube-reinforced hollow concrete columns with different filament winding angles of fiber glass tube are shown in Figure 12. It can be seen that the load and longitudinal strain curves are basically the same at the initial stage of load action. When the load reaches 3050% Pu (10°: 48%, 30°: 43%, 50°: 39%, 70°: 34%, and 90°: 28%), the change of filament winding angle of glass fiber tube has an impact on the load and longitudinal strain curve. The curve slope of the member with large winding angle is greater than that of the member with small winding angle. It shows that the stiffness of the member increases with the increase of the filament winding angle of the glass fiber tube. The load value of the member with larger filament winding angle is greater than that of the member with smaller filament winding angle at the same strain value. The ultimate bearing capacity of the glass fiber tube with filament winding angles of 30°, 50°, 70°, and 90° is 10.8%, 21.7%, 41.5%, and 68.0% higher than that of 10°, respectively. With the increase of winding angle, the circumferential binding force of glass fiber tube increases; that is, the axial compression bearing capacity increases with the increase of fiber winding angle of glass fiber tube.

4.3. Influence of the Concrete Strength Grade

When the concrete strength grade is C50, C45, C40, C35, and C30, respectively, and other conditions are the same, the load and longitudinal strain curves of glass fiber tube-reinforced hollow concrete columns under different concrete strength grades are shown in Figure 13. It can be seen that the load and longitudinal strain curves are basically the same at the initial stage of load action. When the load reaches 30–35% Pu (C50: 29%, C45: 31%, C40: 32%, C35: 34%, and C30: 36%), the change of concrete strength affects the load and longitudinal strain curve. The curve slope of members with higher concrete strength is greater than that of members with lower concrete strength. It shows that the stiffness of members increases with the increase of concrete strength grade. The load value of the member with high concrete strength is greater than that of the member with low concrete strength at the same strain value. The ultimate bearing capacity of concrete strength C50, C45, C40, and C35 is 25.3%, 19.3%, 12.9%, and 6.4% higher than that of C30, respectively. With the increase of concrete strength, the axial compression bearing capacity increases gradually.

4.4. Influence of Hollow Ratio

1When the hollow concrete has the radius of 0mm (solid), 25mm, 50mm, and 75mm, respectively, and other conditions are the same, the load and longitudinal strain curves of glass fiber tube-reinforced hollow concrete columns under hollow concrete with different radii are shown in Figure 14. It can be seen that the load and longitudinal strain curves are basically the same at the initial stage of load action. When the load reaches 2535% Pu (0mm: 28%, 25mm: 29%, 50mm: 31%, and 75mm: 34%), the change of void ratio has an impact on the load and longitudinal strain curve. The curve slope of the member with small hollow ratio is greater than that of the member with large hollow ratio. It shows that the stiffness of the member increases with the decrease of hollow ratio. The load value of the member with small hollow ratio is greater than that of the member with large hollow ratio at the same strain value. The ultimate bearing capacity of hollow concrete with the radius of 0mm (solid), 25mm, and 50mm is 49.1%, 43.5%, and 27.4% higher than that of 75mm, respectively. With the increase of hollow ratio, the area of concrete gradually decreases, resulting in the reduction of bearing capacity of hollow columns; that is, the axial compression bearing capacity decreases with the increase of hollow ratio.

According to the above analysis, the axial compression bearing capacity of glass fiber tube-reinforced hollow concrete columns increases with the increase of the glass fiber tube wall thickness. When the wall thickness is increased from 3mm to 7mm, the bearing capacity is increased by about 41%. The bearing capacity increases with the increase of fiber winding angle of the glass fiber tube. The filament winding angle of glass fiber tube is increased from 10° to 90°, and the bearing capacity is increased by about 68%. The bearing capacity increases with the increase of concrete strength grade. The concrete strength grade is increased from C30 to C50, and the bearing capacity is increased by about 25%. The bearing capacity increases with the decrease of hollow ratio. The radius of concrete hollow decreased from 75mm to 0mm (solid), and the bearing capacity is increased by about 49%. The winding angle and hollow ratio of glass fiber tube have significant influence on the axial compressive capacity of glass fiber tube-reinforced hollow concrete column, followed by the wall thickness of glass fiber tube and concrete strength grade. The glass fiber-reinforced hollow concrete columns should not only consider that the hollow part can reduce the self-weight but also ensure that the axial compression bearing capacity cannot be too low. Therefore, the radius ratio of hollow part should be 0.25 0.5. The axial compression bearing capacity of hollow columns can be compensated by appropriately increasing the wall thickness of glass fiber-reinforced tube, filament winding angle, or concrete strength.

5. Axial Compression Bearing Capacity

There are mainly unified theoretical method and limit equilibrium method for the calculation of axial compression bearing capacity of glass fiber-reinforced hollow concrete columns. Considering that the limit equilibrium method has relatively many analysis and calculation parameters and the stress analysis process is cumbersome, which is not convenient for practical application, a simple and practical bearing capacity calculation formula is established by using the unified theoretical method.

5.1. Unified Theory Method

Combined with the unified theory of concrete filled steel tubular model [24] and according to the failure mechanism and stress characteristics of glass fiber-reinforced hollow concrete column, concrete and glass fiber tube are taken as composite materials. We determine the formula for calculating the axial compression bearing capacity of glass fiber-reinforced hollow concrete columns.where and are undetermined coefficients. is the concrete area. is the axial compressive strength of concrete. is the reinforcement index, where . is the sectional area of reinforcement. is the yield strength of reinforcement. is the restraint index of the glass fiber tube, where . is the cross-sectional area of the glass fiber tube. is the yield strength of the glass fiber tube.

Based on the correctness of the axial compression model of glass fiber tube-reinforced hollow concrete columns, a large number of calculation results are regressed and analyzed by changing the calculation parameters to determine the undetermined coefficients. , and .

We substitute the calculation results of A and B into (3) and sort it out.

5.2. Formula Validation

In order to verify the correctness of the established calculation formula, the calculation results are compared with the test results in the literature [25], as shown in Table 2.

Compared with the experimental results, the average error of the analysis results by the finite element model is 1.029 and the mean square deviation is 0.033. The average error of is 1.018, and the mean square deviation is 0.030. It can be seen that the analytical results of the finite element model and the calculated results by the unified theory method are in good agreement with the test results, which shows that the established calculation formula of axial compression bearing capacity is reasonable.

6. Conclusion

In this paper, the finite element model of glass fiber tube-reinforced hollow concrete columns under axial compression is established, and the correctness of the model is verified by the existing test results. On this basis, the effects of various parameters are analyzed:(1)The finite element model established in this paper can simulate the whole process of axial compression failure, and the failure mode and load and longitudinal strain curve are basically consistent with the test results, which verifies the effectiveness of the axial compression model of the glass fiber tube-reinforced hollow concrete column.(2)The radius ratio of the hollow part should be 0.25‐0.5, and the wall thickness, filament winding angle, or concrete strength of the glass fiber tube can be appropriately improved to make up for the axial compression bearing capacity of the hollow column.(3)The calculation formula of axial compression bearing capacity is established by using the unified theory method. The calculation results are in good agreement with the test results, which can provide a certain reference basis for the design of the hollow structure.

Data Availability

Some or all data, models, or codes generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding authors by request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Liaoning Provincial Department of Education, the Youth Science and Technology Talent Seedling Project (No. LJ2020QNL006), the Scientific Research Fund of Liaoning Provincial Education Department (No. LJ2019JL002), and the Liaoning Province Natural Science Foundation General Project (No. 2022-MS-399).

References

Z. Han, P. Zhang, and T. Zheng, “Research pogress of forming process of fiber reinforced polymer composite grid structure,” Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 845–858, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
H. Zhang, L. He, and P. Cao, “Fiber winding angle influence analysis on mechanical behavior of steel-encased concrete filled FRP tubular column subjected to eccentric compression load,” Journal of Building Structures, vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 345–352, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
F. Li, J. S. Liu, and D. D. Zhang, “Tensile experiments on the tooth connections with filament winding between GFRP tube and aluminum alloy tube,” Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, vol. 35, no. 10, pp. 2678–2688, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
R. Realfonzo and A. Napoli, “Confining concrete members with FRP systems: p,” Composite Structures, vol. 104, no. 5, pp. 304–319, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Wang and B. Chen, Steel Reinforced concrete-filled Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer or Steel Tubular Structures, Liaoning Science and Technology Publishing House, Shenyang, China, 2013.
A. Djerrad, F. Fan, X. Zhi, and Q. Wu, “Experimental and FEM analysis of AFRP strengthened short and long steel tube under axial compression,” Thin-Walled Structures, vol. 139, pp. 9–23, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Chellapandian, S. S. Prakash, and A. Rajagopal, “Analytical and finite element studies on hybrid FRP strengthened RC column elements under axial and eccentric compression,” Composite Structures, vol. 184, pp. 234–248, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Li, Research on Axial Compression Performance of GFRP Tube Filled with Steel Reinforced Recycled concrete Composite Columns, Xian University of Technology, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China, 2019.
Z. Zhao, P. Zhang, S. Zhou, and X. Fan, “Collapse pressure of randomly corroded spherical shell,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 246, Article ID 110604, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Idris and T. Ozbakkaloglu, “Flexural behavior of FRP-HSC-steel double skin tubular beams under reversed-cyclic loading,” Thin-Walled Structures, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 89–101, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. P. Sun, M. M. Jia, S. M. Zhang, and Y. Wang, “Study of buckling-restrained braces with concrete infilled GFRP tubes,” Thin-Walled Structures, vol. 136, no. 3, pp. 16–33, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Huang, C. Zhang, L. Yan, and B. Kasal, “Flexural behavior of U-shape FRP profile-RC composite beams with inner GFRP tube confinement at concrete compression zone,” Composite Structures, vol. 184, no. 1, pp. 674–687, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Zhao, S. Zhou, C. Zheng, and L. Tang, “Predictions of compression capacity of randomly corroded WHSJs based on artificial neural network,” Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Structures, vol. 29, no. 15, pp. 2156–2164, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Zhao, H. Liu, and B. Liang, “Compressive capacity of corroded welded hollow spherical joints,” Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, vol. 33, no. 1, Article ID 04018094, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Zhao, H. Zhang, L. Xian, and H. Liu, “Tensile strength of Q345 steel with random pitting corrosion based on numerical analysis,” Thin-Walled Structures, vol. 148, Article ID 106579, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Tian, Z. Zhou, and J. Lu, “Meso-scale numerical simulation of axial compression performance of fiber reinforced polymer composite-confined ultra-high performance concrete,” Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 1629–1638, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
X. Jian, Research on Transmission Mechanism and Ultimate Bearing Capacity of Rectangular Steel Tube Columns Reinforced by Intermittent Angle, Liaoning Technical University, Fuxin, Liaoning, China, 2019.
N. Zhang, L. Wang, and H. Han, “GFRP tube splicing method of GFRP concrete column,” Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, vol. 47, no. 10, pp. 64–69, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
X. Jian, H. Liu, Z. Zhao, X. Wu, M. Lei, and Z. Chen, “A study of the mechanical behavior of rectangular steel tubular column strengthened using intermittent welding angle steel,” Structures, vol. 33, pp. 3298–3310, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. M. Hassan, O. A. Hodhod, M. S. Hilal, and H. Bahnasaway, “Behavior of eccentrically loaded high strength concrete columns jacketed with FRP laminates,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 138, no. 5, pp. 508–527, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Hussein Abdallah, M. Shazly, H. M. Mohamed, R. Masmoudi, and A. Mousa, “Nonlinear finite element analysis of short and long reinforced concrete columns confined with GFRP tubes,” Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, vol. 36, no. 13, pp. 972–987, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Y. Yeh and K. C. Chang, “Size and shape effects on strength and ultimate strain in FRP confined rectangular concrete columns,” Journal of Mechanics, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 677–690, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. I. Wen, S. Yang, and N. A. Yu, “Axial compression performance of GFRP-concrete-steel tubular composite column,” Journal of Shenyang University of Technology, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 346–351, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
K. He, Y. Chen, and Y. Yan, “Axial mechanical properties of concrete-filled GFRP tubular hollow composite columns,” Composite Structures, vol. 243, Article ID 112174, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. L. Chen and L. G. Wang, “Experimental study on hollow steel-reinforced concrete-filled GFRP tubular members under axial compression,” Steel and Composite Structures, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 59–66, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
Z. Hashin, “Failure criteria for unidirectional fiber composites,” Journal of Applied Mechanics, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 329–334, 1980.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Qin, Mechanical Behaviors Study on GFRP Tube Filled with Reinforced concrete Members, Northeastern University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China, 2009.
L. Lam and J. G. Teng, “Design-oriented stress-strain model for FRP-confined concrete,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 17, no. 6-7, pp. 471–489, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Zhong, The concrete-filled Steel Tubular Structures, Heilongjiang Science and Technology Press, Harbin, China, 1994.
Ni Zhang, Experimental Research and Theoretical Analysis on GFRP Tube Filled with Reinforced Hollow concrete Members, Northeastern University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China, 2016.

Copyright

Copyright © 2022 Xiangyang Jian et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies