[Retracted] The Impact of Family Sustainable Livelihood and Environmental Cognition on Herdsmen’s Choice of Production Behavior

Table 4

Regression results of livelihood capital and environmental cognition measurement indexes on Herdsmen’s production behavior.

Variables		Model 1		Model 2
		Coefficient	OR value	Coefficient	OR value
Natural capital	Grassland area	0.1241	0.8524	0.1218	0.8463
	Grassland quality	0.2672	0.7328	0.2581	0.7134
Physical capital	Quantity of mutton sheep	0.0031	1.0032	0.0027	1.003
	Housing structure	0.3216	1.0035	0.3209	1.0032
	Number of household appliances and technology products	−0.0124	0.8946	−0.01232	0.8938
Human capital	Number of family labor force	0.3074	1.2989	0.3185	1.2996
	Average level of education	0.0618	1.0639	0.0671	1.0712
	Health status	0.0214	1.0213	0.0219	1.0239
Social capital	Experience of village cadres	0.2689	0.9241	0.2516	0.9048
	Cooperative participation	0.3217	1.3041	0.3025	1.2897
	Social network relationship	0.2864	1.1431	0.2691	1.0956
Financial capital	Family income in 2018	0.1542	1.2463	0.0857	1.0925
	Credit situation	−0.0328	0.8955	0.0249	0.9141
Control variable	Policy cognition			0.2416	1.2861
	Cognition of ecological environment			0.3512	1.4276
Constant term	−2.4618			0.0127
Log likelihood value	−224.1568			−187.2105
Chi-square value	87.9700			132.6900
Pseudo R2	0.1681			0.2415
Sample size	384			384

Note. indicate that they have passed the significance test at the statistical level of 10%, 5%, and 1%, respectively.