Research Article
A New Material Selection Method Based on Weighted Mean Values of Overall Performance Scores from Different Multicriteria Decision-Making Methods
Table 4
Overall performance scores of the alternative materials obtained from different MCDM methods.
| ā | A1 | A2 | A3 | A4 | A5 | A6 | A7 | A8 | A9 |
| SAW | 0.388 | 0.405 | 0.389 | 0.286 | 0.469 | 0.417 | 0.242 | 0.656 | 0.570 | TOPSIS | 0.403 | 0.406 | 0.396 | 0.298 | 0.461 | 0.393 | 0.268 | 0.597 | 0.506 | GRA | 0.529 | 0.539 | 0.514 | 0.463 | 0.587 | 0.507 | 0.441 | 0.771 | 0.657 | Modified VIKOR | 0.271 | 0.301 | 0.281 | 0.133 | 0.354 | 0.211 | 0.095 | 1.000 | 0.502 | Modified PROMETHEE | 0.479 | 0.489 | 0.480 | 0.422 | 0.525 | 0.496 | 0.397 | 0.630 | 0.582 | RSR | 0.544 | 0.662 | 0.609 | 0.378 | 0.500 | 0.437 | 0.400 | 0.694 | 0.780 |
|
|