Research Article
Optimization of Mechanical Crimping in the Terminal Crimping Process Using a Response Surface Methodology
| Source | DF | Adj SS | Adj MS | F value | value |
| Model | 9 | 1766.97 | 196.33 | 1397.77 | ≤0.001 | Linear | 3 | 2.33 | 0.78 | 5.53 | ≤0.001 | Crimp height (X) | 1 | 1.94 | 1.94 | 13.84 | ≤0.001 | Crimp depth (Y) | 1 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.43 | 0.514 | Crimp width (Z) | 1 | 0.33 | 0.33 | 2.33 | 0.129 | Square | 3 | 1762.85 | 587.62 | 4183.53 | ≤0.001 | Crimp height (X) crimp height (X) | 1 | 1258.10 | 1258.10 | 8957.07 | ≤0.001 | Crimp depth (Y) crimp depth (Y) | 1 | 339.47 | 339.47 | 2416.84 | ≤0.001 | Crimp width (Z) crimp width (Z) | 1 | 460.68 | 460.68 | 3279.84 | ≤0.001 | Two-way interaction | 3 | 1.79 | 0.60 | 4.24 | ≤0.001 | Crimp height (X) crimp depth (Y) | 1 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 5.18 | 0.024 | Crimp height (X) crimp width (Z) | 1 | 0.44 | 0.44 | 3.13 | 0.078 | Crimp depth (Y) crimp width (Z) | 1 | 0.62 | 0.62 | 4.42 | 0.037 | Error | 190 | 26.69 | 0.14 | | | Lack-of-fit | 5 | 19.31 | 3.86 | 96.87 | 0.531 | Pure error | 185 | 7.38 | 0.04 | | | Total | 199 | 1793.66 | | | |
|
|