Research Article
Study on Evaluation Theory of Bridge Damage State and Methodology on Early Warning of Danger
Table 2
Comparison of FAR and WT among methods I, II, and III.
| Test no. | Method I | Method II | Method III | FAR (%) | WT (min) | FAR (%) | WT (min) | FAR (%) | WT (min) |
| 1 | 2.1 | 8.34 | 10.7 | 20.45 | 11.4 | 24.77 | 2 | 2.4 | 7.98 | 11.0 | 20.47 | 12.0 | 29.03 | 3 | 1.9 | 7.88 | 9.7 | 22.01 | 10.8 | 26.74 | 4 | 1.7 | 9.01 | 9.9 | 23.14 | 10.5 | 25.64 | 5 | 2.0 | 8.45 | 11.5 | 25.16 | 12.4 | 23.33 |
|
|