Research Article
A Simplified Finite Element Model for Modular Steel Structure Building Wallboard through Experimental Research and Finite Element Analysis
Table 6
Comparison of the ultimate bearing capacity and initial stiffness for QY-2.
| | ā | Ultimate bearing capacity (kN) | Increase multiple | Initial stiffness (kN/mm) | Increase multiple |
| | Experimental results | 65.4 | 1.00 | 8.30 | 1.00 | | Pure frame in finite element model | 28.2 | 0.43 | 0.93 | 0.11 | | Side contact of bending plate (0.06) | 497.8 | 7.61 | 26.29 | 3.17 | | Side contact of bending plate (0.15) | 517.9 | 7.92 | 27.16 | 3.27 | | Surface binding in finite element model | 611.9 | 9.36 | 69.89 | 8.42 | | 50% surface binding in finite element model | 462.8 | 7.08 | 46.41 | 6.00 | | 25% surface binding in finite element model | 372.5 | 5.70 | 42.83 | 5.59 | | 12.5% surface binding in finite element model | 202.3 | 3.09 | 25.45 | 3.07 | | One-point binding in finite element model | 30.7 | 0.47 | 1.04 | 0.13 | | Two-point binding in finite element model | 92.5 | 1.41 | 13.81 | 1.66 | | Single row node binding in finite element model | 330.3 | 5.05 | 36.96 | 4.45 | | Double-row node binding in finite element model | 744.6 | 11.39 | 51.36 | 6.18 |
|
|