Review Article

[Retracted] Maintenance Methodologies Embraced for Railroad Systems: A Review

Table 3

Inferences of geometrical track maintenance methods.

Author ReferenceEvaluation SchemeConcentrated segmentParameters involvedTools EmployedResearch Gap

[7]Case studyTrack maintenanceTrack alignment defectsDecision support systemsProbability prediction of alert limits

[8]Case studyTrack maintenanceTotal cost/renewal actions/speed restrictionsMathematical modellingDegradation parameters/different network configuration

[9]Case studyTrack maintenanceTrack alignment parametersHBM/Monte Carlo SimulationModel sensitivity/correlation of formulation

[10]Case studyTrack maintenanceTrack alignment parametersMarkov decision processPermissible speed restriction

[15]Case studyTrack maintenanceTrack alignment parametersWeibull approachImprovement of TPI

[47]Case studyRail maintenanceRail parametersVirMaLab/Bayesian modelsIntegration of meta-heuristics

[51]Case studyRail maintenanceLocation/time of defect occurrence/defect typeMarkov decision process/Whittle indicesCrew assignment for maintenance operations

[57]Case studyTrack maintenanceRail type length/allowable speed/ballast type/fastener type/passenger capacityMonte Carlo simulation/K-means clustering algorithmReduction of maintenance cost

[58]Case studyTrack maintenanceMaintenance window/frequency of inspectionMonte Carlo simulation/sensitivity analysisIncrease frequency and response time for maintenance

[59]Case studyTrack maintenanceTrack geometry inspection valuesHeuristics/analytical frameworkTime optimization

[60]Case studyTrack qualityTrack indices/longitudinal levelLinear regression analysisBest fit integrated model

[47]Case studyTrack maintenanceLongitudinal level, alignment, gauge, twist, and cross-level.Dagum distributionFitness of the model for varying track components

[48]Case studyTrack maintenanceTrack alignment levels/standard deviationMathematical modelling/MILP/Monte Carlo processMaintenance cost