Research Article

Microsurgical Varicocelectomy: Experience of Our Sub-Subinguinal Approach and Review of the Literature

Table 2

Semen indexes of left varicocele patients with low sperm quality.

Age (mean ± SD)Preoperation (mean ± SD)6 months after surgery (mean ± SD)12 months after surgery (mean ± SD)

Left varicocele patients
 All operated patients (519)27.4 ± 4.6
 Sperm concentration × 106/ml19.24 ± 3.6927.42 ± 10.32a34.20 ± 16.29b,c
 Grade (a + b) %13.78 ± 3.2520.98 ± 8.21a27.59 ± 13.71b,c
Patient with improved sperm quality (327/519)
 Sperm concentration × 106/ml19.23 ± 3.4234.52 ± 5.1345.75 ± 7.54
 Grade (a + b) %13.43 ± 3.6426.23 ± 5.5437.27 ± 6.59
Bilateral varicocele patients
 All operated patients (58)27.1 ± 4.8
 Sperm concentration × 106/ml19.21 ± 3.2427.36 ± 10.26a33.87 ± 15.20b,c
 Grade (a + b) %13.54 ± 2.7520.75 ± 8.21a28.53 ± 14.83b,c
Patient with improved sperm quality (38/58)
 Sperm concentration × 106/ml19.26 ± 3.1233.76 ± 6.1243.56 ± 8.55
 Grade (a + b) %13.24 ± 3.1725.35 ± 6.1438.23 ± 7.65

a6 months after surgery vs. preoperation (). b12 months after surgery vs. preoperation (). c6 months after surgery vs. 6 months after surgery ().