Research Article
A Predictive Model and Survival Analysis for Tube Feeding in ALS Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study in a Chinese ALS Clinic
Table 1
The clinical characteristics of ALS patients stratified by the tube feeding at diagnosis or during follow-up.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Patients with bulbar onset, older onset age, early body weight loss, low BMI at baseline, history of ischemic stroke, and high ALSFRS-R slope tended to have tube feeding. In addition, the patient with a low ALSFRS-R score and subregion score or at baseline was more likely to have tube feeding. The percentage of ALS patients with bulbar, lower limb, or respiratory involved at baseline was higher in the tube feeding group. During the follow-up, NIV users and patients with dyspnea or dysphagia were more likely to have tube feeding. The mortality rate of patients with tube feeding was higher than those without tube feeding. ALS patients with past history at diagnosis (such as hyperlipidemia, hypertension, diabetes, drinking, smoking, depression, anxiety, malignancy, allergy, exposure of toxic substances, trauma, and surgical history) had no difference in tube feeding. Familiar ALS patients did not have the higher tube feeding rate. Note: ALSFRS-R: Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale revised; BMI: body mass index; a: at baseline; y: year; m: month; kg: kilogram; NIV: noninvasive ventilation; NBRI: body regions involved; : number; : probability. In bold: value < 0.05. |