Research Article

A Predictive Model and Survival Analysis for Tube Feeding in ALS Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study in a Chinese ALS Clinic

Table 3

The clinical characteristics of patients referred to tube feeding, stratified by the tube feeding at diagnosis or during follow-up.

VariablesTube feeding acceptanceTotal ()Statistics
No ()Yes ()
(%) or mean (SD) or median (IQR) (%) or mean (SD) or median (IQR) (%) or mean (SD) or median (IQR)

At baseline
Sex1
 Male21 (56.8)19 (55.9)40 (56.3)
 Female16 (43.2)15 (44.1)31 (43.7)
Familiar ALS5 (13.5)3 (8.8)8 (11.3)Fisher’s exact test0.712
Age of onset (y)53.27 (11.81)58.09 (12.37)55.58 (12.24)-test0.098
Death12 (32.4)14 (41.2)26 (36.6)0.605
Site of disease onset0.586
 Bulbar14 (37.8)16 (47.1)30 (42.3)
 Spinal23 (62.2)18 (52.9)41 (57.7)
Time to diagnose (m)12.00 (9.00, 18.00)9.00 (6.25, 12.00)11.00 (8.00, 14.50)Mann–Whitney test0.016
With loss of body weight at baseline25 (67.6)22 (64.7)47 (66.2)0.997
BMI at baseline (kg/m2)21.24 (3.14)21.15 (4.08)21.20 (3.59)-test0.911
Weight loss at baseline (kg)3.00 (0.00, 5.00)5.00 (0.00, 10.00)5.00 (0.00, 10.00)Mann–Whitney test0.253
NBRIFisher’s exact test0.159
 16 (16.2)2 (5.9)8 (11.3)
 28 (21.6)5 (14.7)13 (18.3)
 312 (32.4)9 (26.5)21 (29.6)
 410 (27.0)18 (52.9)28 (39.4)
The involvement of different segments
 Bulbar involvement30 (81.1)32 (94.1)62 (87.3)Fisher’s exact test0.155
 Upper limb involvement28 (75.7)28 (82.4)56 (78.9)0.691
 Lower limb involvement25 (67.6)30 (88.2)55 (77.5)0.072
 Respiratory involvement15 (40.5)21 (61.8)36 (50.7)0.121
 ALSFRS-R score37.00 (31.00, 40.00]31.00 (18.00, 36.75)35.00 (27.50, 39.50)Mann–Whitney test0.005
 Bulbar score10.00 (6.00, 11.00)5.50 (2.00, 10.00)9.00 (5.00, 11.00)Mann–Whitney test0.003
 Fine motor score9.00 (6.00, 11.00)7.00 (3.00, 9.00)8.00 (4.00, 10.00)Mann–Whitney test0.034
 Gross motor score8.00 (6.00, 10.00)5.00 (2.00, 8.75)7.00 (3.00, 10.00)Mann–Whitney test0.094
 Respiratory score12.00 (11.00, 12.00)11.00 (9.00, 12.00)12.00 (10.00, 12.00)Mann–Whitney test0.026
 ALSFRS-R slope0.58 (0.35, 0.92)0.84 (0.56, 1.37)0.71 (0.45, 1.23)Mann–Whitney test0.038
 Ischemic stroke0 (0.0)3 (8.8)3 (4.2)Fisher’s exact test0.105
During follow-up
 NIV routine users12 (32.4)20 (58.8)32 (45.1)0.046
 Dyspnea21 (56.8)26 (76.5)47 (66.2)0.133
 Dysphagia30 (81.1)24 (70.6)54 (76.1)0.449
Past history
 Hyperlipidemia1 (2.7)4 (11.8)5 (7.0)Fisher’s exact test0.187
 Hypertension10 (27.0)11 (32.4)21 (29.6)0.817
 Diabetes2 (5.4)1 (2.9)3 (4.2)Fisher’s exact test1
 Drinking12 (32.4)12 (35.3)24 (33.8)0.997
 Smoking15 (40.5)13 (38.2)28 (39.4)1
 Depression1 (2.7)0 (0.0)1 (1.4)Fisher’s exact test1
 Anxiety0 (0.0)1 (2.9)1 (1.4)Fisher’s exact test0.479
 Malignancy3 (8.1)1 (2.9)4 (5.6)Fisher’s exact test0.615
 Allergy0 (0.0)2 (5.9)2 (2.8)Fisher’s exact test0.226
 Exposure of toxic substances5 (13.5)6 (17.6)11 (15.5)0.879
 Trauma7 (18.9)9 (26.5)16 (22.5)0.634
 Surgical history14 (37.8)12 (36.4)26 (37.1)1

Tube feeding consists of gastrostomy and nasogastric tube feeding. Patients who received tube feeding had a shorter time from disease onset to diagnosis, lower ALSFRS-R score, lower bulbar score, lower fine motor score, and lower respiratory score than patients without swallowing intervention at baseline. During the follow-up, patients who received tube feeding were more likely to receive NIV support than those without. However, ALS patients with past history at diagnosis (such as hyperlipidemia, hypertension, diabetes, drinking, smoking, depression, anxiety, malignancy, allergy, exposure of toxic substances, trauma, and surgical history) had no difference in the acceptance of tube feeding. Familiar ALS patients were not more accepting of tube feeding than others. The mortality rate of patients with tube feeding was similar to those without tube feeding. Note: ALSFRS-R: Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale revised; BMI: body mass index; y: year; m: month; kg: kilogram; NIV: noninvasive ventilation; NBRI: body regions involved; : number; : probability. In bold: value < 0.05.