Research Article

Candidate Selection for Implantation: Noninvasive Predictors of Seizure Onset Zone Focality and Surgical Outcome in People with Drug-Resistant Epilepsy Evaluated by Intracranial Video-EEG Monitoring—A Retrospective Cohort Study

Table 1

Diagnostic and surgical cohort description.

VariableDiagnostic cohorta ()Surgical cohortb ()
Focal SOZ ()Nonfocal SOZ ()Good outcome ()Poor outcome ()

Epilepsy duration (years)
Age at evaluation (years)
Gender (male)22 (56.4)29 (50)13 (56.5)21 (51.2)
Seizure frequency
 Daily7 (17.9)13 (22.4)2 (8.7)11 (26.8)
 Weekly21 (53.8)35 (60.3)12 (52.2)23 (56.1)
 Monthly11 (28.2)10 (17.2)9 (39.1)7 (17.1)
Presence of FBTCS25 (64.1)42 (72.4)15 (65.2)31 (75.6)
Failed ASMs
MRI lesion group
 Focal lesion8 (20.5)9 (15.5)6 (26.1)3 (7.3)
 Nonfocal lesion8 (20.5)12 (20.7)6 (26.1)8 (19.5)
 Nonlesional23 (59)37 (63.8)11 (47.8)30 (73.2)
MRI lesion type
 MTS alone or associated5 (12.8)5 (8.6)6 (26.1)2 (4.9)
 CDM9 (23.1)11 (19)4 (17.4)7 (17.1)
 Others2 (5.1)5 (8.6)2 (8.7)2 (4.9)
 Normal or nonspecific23 (59)37 (63.8)11 (47.8)30 (73.2)
SVEM IEDs
 Normal or focal only24 (61.5)28 (48.3)15 (65.2)21 (51.2)
 Multifocal only12 (30.8)15 (25.9)6 (26.1)11 (26.8)
 Generalised3 (7.7)15 (25.9)2 (8.7)9 (22)
SVEM ictal onset
 Focal23 (59)27 (46.6)12 (52.2)23 (56.1)
 Multifocal2 (5.1)9 (15.5)3 (13)3 (7.3)
 Nonlocalising14 (35.9)22 (37.9)8 (34.8)15 (36.6)
Localisation hypothesis
 TLE21 (53.8)31 (53.4)16 (69.6)18 (43.9)
 FLE10 (25.6)17 (29.3)7 (30.4)14 (34.1)
 PLE or OLE7 (17.9)4 (6.9)05 (12.2)
 TLE and ETE1 (2.6)6 (10.3)04 (9.8)
Lateralisation hypothesis
 Left20 (51.3)26 (44.8)9 (39.1)21 (51.2)
 Right15 (38.5)17 (29.3)10 (43.5)13 (31.7)
 Unknown4 (10.3)15 (25.9)4 (17.4)7 (17.1)
IVEM type (SEEG/subdural electrodes)30/944/1417/625/16
Bilateral SEEG15 (50)29 (65.9)11 (64.7)15 (60)
electrodes1 (3.3)7 (15.9)05 (20)
SOZ focality
 Sublobar39 (100)NA15 (65.2)11 (26.8)
 LobarNA22 (37.9)5 (21.7)13 (31.7)
 MultilobarNA20 (34.5)2 (8.7)11 (26.8)
 BilateralNA16 (27.6)1 (4.3)6 (14.6)
Surgical outcome
 Engel class I15 (38.5)8 (13.8)23 (100)NA
 Engel class II6 (15.4)9 (15.5)NA15 (36.6)
 Engel class III3 (7.7)10 (17.2)NA13 (31.7)
 Engel class IV2 (5.1)11 (19)NA13 (31.7)
year or no surgery13 (33.3)20 (34.5)NANA
Follow-up after surgery (years)NANA

Note: data are given in for continuous variables or number (percentage) for categorical variables. Abbreviations: ASMs: antiseizure medications; CDM: cortical development malformation; ETE: extratemporal epilepsy; FBTCS: focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures; FLE: frontal lobe epilepsy; IEDs: interictal epileptiform discharges; IVEM: intracranial video-EEG monitoring; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; MTS: mesial temporal sclerosis; NA: not applicable; OLE: occipital lobe epilepsy; PLE: parietal lobe epilepsy; SEEG: stereoelectroencephalography; SOZ: seizure onset zone; SVEM: scalp video-EEG monitoring; TLE: temporal lobe epilepsy. aThe diagnostic cohort comprised people with DRE evaluated by IVEM with a conclusive result. Focal SOZ was defined as a sublobar ictal onset identified on IVEM. Nonfocal SOZ included a lobar, multilobar, or bilateral ictal onset on IVEM. bThe surgical cohort was defined as patients evaluated by IVEM who underwent a surgery and a minimum follow-up of one year. Good outcome was considered as a postoperative outcome of Engel class I. Poor outcome included a postoperative outcome of Engel class II or worse.