Effects of Different Aquafeed Sources on Growth Performance, Oxidative Capacity, and Fatty Acid Profile of Three Carps Reared in the Semi-Intensive Composite Culture System
Table 6
Antioxidant capacity of major carp species fed different commercial diets.
Parameter
Specie
Dietary treatments1
SEM2
p-Value
D1
D2
D3
D4
D5
D6
D7
D8
Superoxide dismutase (µ/mg)
Muscle
L. rohita
6.71a
6.73a
6.80a
6.74a
6.78a
6.79a
4.32b
6.80a
0.183
<0.001
C. catla
6.23a
6.44a
6.23a
6.29a
6.18a
6.29a
4.15b
6.28a
0.123
0.04
C. carpio
6.77a
6.76a
6.84a
6.69a
6.76a
6.82a
5.01b
6.79a
0.117
0.03
Liver
L. rohita
7.05a
6.96a
7.01a
6.97a
6.92a
6.88a
4.19b
7.04a
0.285
<0.001
C. catla
6.97a
6.88a
6.91a
6.94a
6.93a
6.88a
4.35b
6.89a
0.102
<0.001
C. carpio
6.98a
6.94a
6.94a
6.90a
6.87a
6.94a
4.17b
6.96a
0.121
<0.001
Catalases (µ/mg)
Muscle
L. rohita
77.28
76.59
75.99
75.99
77.3
77.32
75.26
75.18
1.946
0.12
C. catla
77.47
76.82
76.44
76.73
76.76
78.41
77.14
76.14
1.135
0.40
C. carpio
77.82
75.55
77.98
76.92
75.98
77.33
76.16
75.89
1.323
0.31
Liver
L. rohita
78.24
77.57
77.07
76.52
77.81
77.86
76.30
75.42
1.954
0.23
C. catla
77.43
77.56
75.60
77.82
77.8
76.92
77.14
76.71
1.139
0.17
C. carpio
77.9
77.73
77.33
78.7
77.58
78.13
77.46
78.01
1.345
0.32
Glutathione peroxidase (µ/mg)
Muscle
L. rohita
256.98a
258.60a
261.25a
267.18a
264.39a
257.85a
221.74b
259.35a
8.872
0.04
C. catla
250.91a
257.64a
260.66a
258.83a
259.44a
258.43a
220.23b
257.26a
7.561
<0.001
C. carpio
262.11a
269.18a
261.62a
255.25a
261.85a
259.46a
212.25b
256.42a
5.251
0.03
Liver
L. rohita
259.88a
254.12a
3.51
251.25a
249.94a
255.38a
227.25b
255.74a
9.254
0.02
C. catla
234.59a
256.93a
3.24
258.26a
258.10a
257.19a
215.98b
256.64a
10.299
0.02
C. carpio
259.93a
253.73a
3.46
258.73a
262.35a
251.16a
224.35b
262.65a
7.063
0.04
Note. 1Dietary treatments = (D1–D8) feeds of different sources and 2SEM = standard error of means. a−eSuperscripts indicate the significant differences among means within a row.