Research Article

Effects of Different Aquafeed Sources on Growth Performance, Oxidative Capacity, and Fatty Acid Profile of Three Carps Reared in the Semi-Intensive Composite Culture System

Table 6

Antioxidant capacity of major carp species fed different commercial diets.

ParameterSpecieDietary treatments1SEM2p-Value
D1D2D3D4D5D6D7D8

Superoxide dismutase (µ/mg)
 MuscleL. rohita6.71a6.73a6.80a6.74a6.78a6.79a4.32b6.80a0.183<0.001
C. catla6.23a6.44a6.23a6.29a6.18a6.29a4.15b6.28a0.1230.04
C. carpio6.77a6.76a6.84a6.69a6.76a6.82a5.01b6.79a0.1170.03
 LiverL. rohita7.05a6.96a7.01a6.97a6.92a6.88a4.19b7.04a0.285<0.001
C. catla6.97a6.88a6.91a6.94a6.93a6.88a4.35b6.89a0.102<0.001
C. carpio6.98a6.94a6.94a6.90a6.87a6.94a4.17b6.96a0.121<0.001
Catalases (µ/mg)
 MuscleL. rohita77.2876.5975.9975.9977.377.3275.2675.181.9460.12
C. catla77.4776.8276.4476.7376.7678.4177.1476.141.1350.40
C. carpio77.8275.5577.9876.9275.9877.3376.1675.891.3230.31
 LiverL. rohita78.2477.5777.0776.5277.8177.8676.3075.421.9540.23
C. catla77.4377.5675.6077.8277.876.9277.1476.711.1390.17
C. carpio77.977.7377.3378.777.5878.1377.4678.011.3450.32
Glutathione peroxidase (µ/mg)
 MuscleL. rohita256.98a258.60a261.25a267.18a264.39a257.85a221.74b259.35a8.8720.04
C. catla250.91a257.64a260.66a258.83a259.44a258.43a220.23b257.26a7.561<0.001
C. carpio262.11a269.18a261.62a255.25a261.85a259.46a212.25b256.42a5.2510.03
 LiverL. rohita259.88a254.12a3.51251.25a249.94a255.38a227.25b255.74a9.2540.02
C. catla234.59a256.93a3.24258.26a258.10a257.19a215.98b256.64a10.2990.02
C. carpio259.93a253.73a3.46258.73a262.35a251.16a224.35b262.65a7.0630.04

Note. 1Dietary treatments = (D1–D8) feeds of different sources and 2SEM = standard error of means. a−eSuperscripts indicate the significant differences among means within a row.