Research Article

Effects of Different Aquafeed Sources on Growth Performance, Oxidative Capacity, and Fatty Acid Profile of Three Carps Reared in the Semi-Intensive Composite Culture System

Table 7

Fatty acid analysis of major carp species fed different commercial diets.

Fatty acids codesSpecieDietary treatments1SEM2p-Value
D1D2D3D4D5D6D7D8

14 : 00L. rohita3.11b3.10b3.65a3.62a3.12b3.11b3.08c3.10b0.3620.02
C. catla3.12b3.13b3.52a3.46a3.14b2.99c2.98c3.19b0.4420.01
C. carpio3.23b3.25b3.45a3.38a3.23b3.22b3.14c3.24b0.326<0.001
16 : 00L. rohita9.24b9.22b9.37a9.35a9.23b9.22b9.10c9.22b0.4340.02
C. catla9.31b9.32b9.49a9.51a9.32b9.29b9.17c9.33b0.5240.03
C. carpio9.17b9.15b9.38a9.36a9.15b9.16b9.06c9.15b0.4350.03
18 : 00L. rohita5.625.615.645.625.625.645.655.640.8410.23
C. catla5.565.555.565.555.545.535.565.550.9150.12
C. carpio5.925.935.915.935.945.925.905.930.9650.11
18 : 1 (n−9)L. rohita11.4211.4211.4411.4411.4511.4311.4411.450.8680.24
C. catla11.6311.6411.6511.6311.5911.6111.6211.630.8480.13
C. carpio11.6211.5811.6111.5911.6011.6211.5911.580.7380.31
18 : 2 (n−6)L. rohita14.5314.5614.5214.5314.5614.5114.5514.520.3480.09
C. catla13.9513.9613.8913.9213.8813.9213.9513.960.9570.21
C. carpio14.5614.5114.5514.5314.5514.4914.5214.490.7230.16
20 : 4 (n−3)L. rohita4.334.354.354.314.334.324.324.330.7860.12
C. catla4.014.014.024.024.054.054.004.060.1340.99
C. carpio4.174.184.194.164.184.164.174.170.5160.62
22 : 6 (n−3)L. rohita15.2315.2615.2415.2315.2315.2115.2515.280.6360.08
C. catla14.6214.6514.6214.6514.6214.6314.6214.590.7520.10
C. carpio15.6915.7215.7115.6915.7215.7115.7215.710.5640.21

Note. 1Dietary treatments = (D1–D8) feeds of different sources and 2SEM = standard error of means. a−eSuperscripts indicate the significant differences among means within a row.