Clinical Study
Early Postoperative Results after Removal of Cranially Migrated Lumbar Disc Prolapse: Retrospective Comparison of Three Different Surgical Strategies
| | 
 |  |  | Group A (interlaminar approach) 
 | Group B (translaminar approach) 
 | Group C (endoscopic transforaminal approach) 
 | Level of significance |  | 
 |  | Duration of surgery (minutes) MED (MIN–MAX; SD)
 | 74 (35–140; 28.13)
 | 57.5 (38–75; 11.98)
 | 105 (60–180; 34.9)
 | <0.001 ANOVA
 |  | 
 |  | Surgical revisions for symptomatic herniation | 5/27 (14.8%)
 | 1/22 (4.5%)
 | 7/20 (35%)
 | 0.031 
 |  | 
 |  | perioperative surgical complications | 1/27 (3.7%)
 | 0/22 (0%)
 | 3/20 (15%)
 | 0.097 chi2
 |  | 
 |  | Length of hospital stay (days) MED (MIN–MAX; SD)
 | 8 (7–30; 5)
 | 8 (6–13; 1)
 | 9 (6–22; 5)
 | 0.076 ANOVA
 |  | 
 | 
 | 
| MED: median. MIN: minimum.
 MAX: maximum.
 SD: standard deviation.
 ANOVA: analysis of variance.
 Chi2: chi-squared test.
 
 |