Review Article
Can Superabsorbent Polymers Improve Plants Production in Arid Regions?
Table 3
Means of the studied traits for three crop families as a result of different levels of superabsorbent application.
| | 
 |  |  | Mean of SAP treatments (kg ha−1) | Mean of control treatment (kg ha−1) | Coefficient of variations (%) | Min level of SAP (kg ha−1) | Max level of SAP (kg ha−1) |  | 
 |  | Cereals (six experiments) |  | Seed yield (kg ha−1) | 8013.7 | 6954.8 | 59.49 | 7398.8 | 8194.4 |  | Dry matter yield (kg ha−1) | 31319.2 | 25248 | 78.28 | 29464 | 32976.2 |  | Harvest index (%) | 36.96 | 37.22 | 35.35 | 35.17 | 36.11 |  | 
 |  | Medicinal plants (three experiments) |  | Seed yield (kg ha−1) | 3079.62 | 2734.61 | 38.49 | 3040.30 | 3119.45 |  | Dry matter yield (kg ha−1) | 21323.5 | 17056 | 13.83 | 20823 | 21829.5 |  | Harvest index (%) | 15.45 | 14.64 | 31.44 | 15.18 | 14.1 |  | 
 |  | Pulses (five experiments) |  | Seed yield (kg ha−1) | 1642.47 | 1190.32 | 56.83 | 1526.22 | 1749.59 |  | Dry matter yield (kg ha−1) | 3684.63 | 3301.30 | 63.84 | 3555.83 | 3796.12 |  | Harvest index (%) | 49.49 | 42.37 | 20.29 | 48.29 | 50.40 |  | 
 | 
 |