Modeling Nile Tilapia Heterogeneous Growth under Different Stocking Densities during Pre-Grow-Out Stage
Table 3
Validation of the modified growth models in the homogeneous scenario for tilapia Oreochromis niloticus.
Models
Statistics
Treatment 1
Treatment 2
Treatment 3
von Bertalanffy
R2 RMSE U Um Us Uc
0.985.79 0.06 0.09 0.00 0.91
0.97 6.56 0.09 0.20 0.00 0.80
0.98 7.39 0.09 0.64 0.12 0.24
Logistic 1
R2 RMSE U Um Us Uc
0.99 6.58 0.06 0.31 0.15 0.55
0.97 5.97 0.09 0.11 0.00 0.88
0.98 6.45 0.09 0.51 0.19 0.30
Pütter
R2 RMSE U Um Us Uc
0.99 5.62 0.06 0.08 0.01 0.92
0.97 6.60 0.09 0.24 0.00 0.76
0.98 8.21 0.09 0.66 0.15 0.20
Logistic 2
R2 RMSE U Um Us Uc
0.99 6.54 0.07 0.03 0.35 0.64
0.97 5.84 0.09 0.05 0.00 0.95
0.98 4.90 0.09 0.17 0.25 0.59
Gompertz
R2 RMSE U Um Us Uc
0.99 6.29 0.06 0.24 0.03 0.74
0.97 7.35 0.09 0.39 0.00 0.61
0.98 9.99 0.10 0.71 0.15 0.14
Note: R2 = coefficient of determination; RMSE = root- mean- square error; U = Theil’s coefficient of inequality; Um = proportion of mean; Us = proportion of variance; Uc = proportion of covariance.