|
Reference | Gas type | Model | Prediction results |
|
[10] | Xe | Density parameter function | The adsorption ground truth is closer to the experimental results |
[28] | CO2 | Dunning’s correlation sets | Moderate accuracy |
[29] | CO2 | Molecular simulations | Moderate accuracy |
[22] | CO2 | Scalable boosting tree model (SBT) | Satisfactory |
[17] | CO2 | The data were linearly correlated by Toth and sips equations | The sip model showed the least deviation |
[30] | CO2, He, and Ar | Gradient variant decision tree model (GVD) | Accurate for the adsorbed phase |
[31] | CO2 | The vendor and Langmuir metric | Vendor depicts less deviation than the Langmuir metric from the ground truth |
[32] | Kr and N2 | Vacancy solution method | Yeilds parameter optimization |
Our proposed work: Fusion matrix deep learning model (FMDL) | | Adsorption modeling using the D-CNN approach | High accuracy |
|