Sexual (Dys)function after Urethroplasty

Table 2

Anterior urethra, erectile dysfunction: retrospective studies.

Authors, year		Questionnaire	Follow-up (months)	Age (median)	Results
Singh et al., 2010 [32]	150	BMSFI	>3	40	Mean preop BMSFI EF: 9,1; postop: 8,8; = 0,39, NSD
Erickson et al., 2007 [33]	52	BMSFI	22,3	41,7	Mean preop BMSFI EF: 9,2; postop: 8,8; = 0,11, NSD
Coursey et al., 2001 [34]	174	NVQ	36	43,8	69,1% no difference in erectile function; 30,9% worsened erectile function
Nelson et al., 2005 [35]	11	IIEF	56,4	30,6	0% ED
Morey and Kizer, 2006 [36]	22	NVQ	26,1	39,95	No difference between end-to-end and extended anastomotic techniques or other types of penile surgery
Welk and Kodama, 2012 [37]	44	NVQ	40	27,6	No difference between nontransecting APA and dorsal graft
Ekerhult et al., 2013 [38]	169	NVQ	12–132	16–75	No difference between anastomotic repair and onlay

IIEF: International Index of Erectile Function; ED: erectile dysfunction; BMSFI: Brief Male Sexual Function Inventory; NSD: no statistical difference; NVQ: nonvalidated questionnaire.