Research Article
[Retracted] Molecular Docking and Green Synthesis of Bioinorganic TiO2 Nanoparticles against E.coli and S.aureus
Table 3
Comparison with collected work results.
| S.No | Catalyst | Pollutant | Dye/Catalyst dosage | Irradiation source | Efficiency (%) | Ref |
| 1. | RGO/TiO2 | Diphenhydramine (DP) and methyl orange | 7.5 mL/1.0 g L−1 | Mercury | 94 | [31] | 2. | Sn/TiO2 | Malachite green | 25 ml | UV | 90 | [32] | 3. | Pd/TiO2 | Methylene blue | 0.75 g/500 ml | Xenon 300 W | 99.5 | [33] | 4. | CeO2/TiO2 | Bromophenol dye | | Xenon 300W | 72 | [34] | 5. | TiO2nanotubes | Indigo carmine | 100 ml/0.1 g/L | Mercury 125W | 90 | [35] | 6. | TiO2/C | Blue QR 19 | 200/50 mg | Mercury 125 W | 89 | [36] | 7. | Ag-coated ni@ TiO2 | Crystal violet | 20 mL/10 mg | Hg lamp20 W | 80 | [37] | 8. | TiO2 | Methyl orange | 50 mL | Xenonlamp150 W | 80 | [38] | 9. | RuO2/SiO2/TiO2 | Methyl orange | 4 ml | F15 W/T8 UV | 98 | [39] | 10. | CNT/TiO2 | Methyl orange | 1000 mL/200 mg | Mercury300 W | 94 | [40] | 11. | Bi–TiO2 | Methylene blue | 50 ml/0.05 mg | Xenon arc lamp | 95 | Current work |
|
|