Review Article
Comparison of Next-Generation Sequencing Systems
Table 2
Comparison in alignment between Ion Torrent and HiSeq 2000.
| | Ion Torrenta | HiSeq 2000b |
| | Total reads num | 165518 | 205683 | | Total bases num | 18574086 | 18511470 | | Max read length | 201 | 90 | | Min read length | 15 | 90 | | Map reads num | 157258 | 157511 | | Map rate | 95% | 76.57% | | Covered rate | 96.50% | 93.11% | | Total map length | 15800258 | 14176420 | | Total mismatch base | 53475 | 142425 | | Total insertion base | 109550 | 1397 | | Total insertion num | 95740 | 1332 | | Total deletion base | 152495 | 431 | | Total deletion num | 139264 | 238 | | Ave mismatch rate | 0.338% | 1.004% | | Ave insertion rate | 0.693% | 0.009% | | Ave deletion rate | 0.965% | 0.003% |
|
|
a: use TMAP to align; b: use SOAP2 to align.
|