Research Article
Diagnostic Significance of Diffusion-Weighted MRI in Renal Cancer
Table 1
Characteristics of included studies in this pooled analysis.
| First author | Year | Ethnicity | Number | Gender (F/M) | Age (years) | MRI machine type | QUADAS score | Tumor | Benign | Normal |
| Zhang [27] | 2013 | Asians | 45 | 12 | 20 | 31/13 | 52 | GE 3.0 T | 26 | Goyal [26] | 2013 | Asians | 40 | 20 | 0 | 26/10 | 46 (21~80) | Tesla 1.5 T | 26 | Yu [22] | 2012 | Asians | 137 | 0 | 137 | 93/44 | 53 (30~81) | GE 3.0 T | 28 | Rheinheimer [38] | 2012 | Caucasians | 28 | 0 | 30 | 17/9 | 62.0 ± 13.0 | Tesla 1.5 T | 22 | Inci [25] | 2012 | Caucasians | 42 | 0 | 30 | 59/46 | 55 | Siemens 1.5 T | 26 | Tanaka [37] | 2011 | Asians | 36 | 5 | 41 | 21/14 | 57 (38~78) | Philips 1.5 T | 23 | Razek [36] | 2011 | Africans | 45 | 9 | 0 | 24/28 | 5~67 | GE 1.5 T | 26 |
Doğanay [14] | 2011 | Caucasians | 32 | 35 | 50 | 25/33 | 53.0 ± 19.0 | GE 1.5 T | 25 | Sandrasegaran [13] | 2010 | Caucasians | 22 | 20 | 0 | — | — | Siemens 1.5 T | 22 | Taouli [35] | 2009 | Caucasians | 28 | 81 | 0 | 46/18 | 61 (24~85) | Siemens 1.5 T | 24 | Kim [34] | 2009 | Caucasians | 26 | 38 | 0 | — | — | Siemens 1.5 T | 24 | Kilickesmez [24] | 2009 | Caucasians | 16 | 0 | 50 | 25/27 | 52 | Siemens 1.5 T | 20 | 17 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 16 | 0 | 6 | 0 | Zhang [33] | 2008 | Caucasians | 26 | 11 | 0 | | | | 23 | Manenti [18] | 2008 | Caucasians | 27 | 0 | 10 | 16/11 | 62 (45~85) | Philips 3.0 T | 21 | Yoshikawa [20] | 2006 | Caucasians | 28 | 19 | 0 | — | — | Philips 1.5 T | 20 | 28 | 13 | 0 | — | — | Philips 1.5 T | 26 | 19 | 0 | — | — | Philips 1.5 T | 26 | 13 | 0 | — | — | Philips 1.5 T | Squillaci [32] | 2004 | Caucasians | 18 | 0 | 20 | 10/8 | 62 (29~85) | Philips 1.5 T | 20 |
|
|
M: male; F: female; QUADAS: quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies.
|