Journals
Publish with us
Publishing partnerships
About us
Blog
BioMed Research International
Journal overview
For authors
For reviewers
For editors
Table of Contents
Special Issues
BioMed Research International
/
2016
/
Article
/
Tab 1
/
Research Article
Comparison and Prognostic Analysis of Adjuvant Radiotherapy versus Salvage Radiotherapy for Treatment of Radically Resected Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Table 1
Patient characteristics in the two treatment groups.
Adjuvant radiotherapy group
Salvage radiotherapy group
P
value
Gender
Male,
(%)
64 (81.0)
63 (82.9)
0.84
Female,
(%)
15 (19.0)
13 (17.1)
Age (years), mean (range)
58 (44–80)
63 (46–82)
>65 years,
(%)
14 (17.7)
22 (28.9)
0.128
≤65 years,
(%)
65 (82.3)
54 (71.1)
Performance status
<2,
(%)
56 (70.9)
36 (47.4)
0.003
≥2,
(%)
23 (29.1)
40 (52.6)
Surgical-pathological stage
I,
(%)
1 (1.3)
3 (3.9)
0.07
II,
(%)
34 (43.0)
44 (57.9)
III,
(%)
44 (55.7)
29 (38.2)
pT stage
1,
(%)
0 (0.0)
4 (5.3)
0.01
2,
(%)
14 (17.7)
23 (30.3)
3,
(%)
53 (67.1)
46 (60.5)
4,
(%)
12 (15.2)
3 (3.9)
pN status
−,
(%)
38 (8.1)
38 (50.0)
1.0
+,
(%)
41 (51.9)
38 (50.0)
Histologic grade
1,
(%)
8 (10.1)
4 (5.3)
0.61
2,
(%)
51 (64.6)
48 (63.2)
3,
(%)
11 (13.9)
14 (18.4)
Unknown,
(%)
9 (11.4)
10 (13.2)
Tumor location
Upper,
(%)
11 (13.9)
9 (11.8)
0.76
Middle,
(%)
54 (68.4)
55 (72.4)
Lower,
(%)
14 (17.7)
12 (15.8)
Adjuvant chemotherapy
Yes,
(%)
35 (44.3)
39 (51.3)
0.07
No,
(%)
44 (55.7)
37 (48.7)