Research Article

The Application of Internal Suspension Technique in Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy for Renal Ventral Tumors

Table 1

Clinical and pathological characteristics of patients with and without natural suspension technique.

Natural suspension group
()
Control group
()
value

Age (years), mean ± SD60.7 ± 9.762.8 ± 9.2.23
Gender, (%)1.00
 Male18 (56.3)18 (56.3)
 Female14 (43.7)14 (43.7)
Tumor laterality, (%).45
 Right15 (46.9)18 (56.3)
 Left17 (53.1)14 (43.7)
Tumor location (ventral side), (%)32 (100)32 (100)1.00
BMI (kg/m2), mean ± SD22.3 ± 2.622.3 ± 2.9.89
Tumor size (cm), mean ± SD2.6 ± 0.972.6 ± 1.03.70
ASA score median (IQR)2.0 (1.0–2.0) 2.0 (1.0–3.0).20
RENAL score median (IQR)6.0 (5.0–6.8)6.0 (5.0–7.0).90
Preoperative eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2), mean ± SD84.1 ± 11.681.9 ± 11.1.53
Pathological outcomes
Histology, (%).43
 Clear cell29 (90.6)28 (87.5)
 Papillary2 (6.3)4 (12.5)
 Chrome1 (3.1)0
TNM stage, (%)1.00
 T1aN0M029 (90.6)29 (90.6)
 T1bN0M03 (9.4)3 (9.4)
Fuhrman (clear cell), (%).49
 G16 (20.7)9 (32.1)
 G216 (55.2)15 (53.6)
 G37 (24.1)4 (14.3)

ASA: American Society of Anesthesiologists; eGFR: estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate; IQR: interquartile range; SD: standard deviation.