Research Article
The Application of Internal Suspension Technique in Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy for Renal Ventral Tumors
Table 2
Perioperative, oncologic, and functional outcomes of patients with and without natural suspension technique.
| | | Internal suspension group
() | Control group
() | value |
| | Operative time (min), median (IQR) | 78.5 (68.3–91.3) | 89.0 (78.3–102.3) | .12 | | WIT (min), median (IQR) | 15.0 (12.3–17.8) | 19.0 (15.0–25.0) | | | WIT >25 minutes, (%) | 2 (6.3) | 8 (25.0) | | | Tumor resection time (min), median (IQR) | 4.0 (3.0–6.8) | 7.5 (5.0–11.0) | < | | EBL (ml), median (IQR) | 53.5 (25.3–70.8) | 50.0 (20.0–70.0) | .21 | | Positive surgical margins, (%) | 0 (0) | 2 (6.3) | .15 | | Postoperative complications, (%) | 2 (6.3) | 4 (12.5) | .39 | | Follow-up time (months), median (IQR) | 21.5 (14.5–29.5) | 21.0 (13.5–25.0) | .58 | | Trifecta accomplishment, (%) | 28 (87.5) | 20 (62.5) | | | Postoperative eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2), mean ± SD | 77.8 ± 10.1 | 74.5 ± 7.9 | .70 |
|
|
ly significant. WIT: warm ischemia time; EBL: estimated blood loss; eGFR: estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate; IQR: interquartile range; SD: standard deviation.
|
