Review Article

Antibiotic Elution from Hip and Knee Acrylic Bone Cement Spacers: A Systematic Review

Table 3

Findings about the antibiotic elution from hip and knee spacers at spacer removal.

StudyPlace of
measurement
Length of spacer implantationPharmacokinetic findingsInfection control

Fink et al. [9]Local tissueSix weeks 50.93 µg/g, 177.24 µg/g, 322.29 µg/g
No differences in [G] and [C] regardless of whether V has been added to cement
No differences between levels associated with acetabular cup and those with spacer stem
n.r.

Hsieh et al. [10]Joint fluidMean 107 daysAll [V] and [A] above the MIC despite an apparent trend toward decreasing levels over time97.8%

Masri et al. [14]Joint fluidMean 118 daysNo significant differences between hip and knee spacers
Highest [T] and [V] when at least 3.6 g T was impregnated
Significant increase when the dose of T was increased from at most 2.4 g to at least 3.6 g per cement package
V has no significant influence on [T]
Increase of the V dose from 1 to 1.5–2 g V per cement package with no significant influence on [T] or [V]
Apparent trend toward decreasing levels over time
n.r.

Mutimer et al. [15]Joint fluidMedian 99 daysMedian [G] 0.46 µg/ml100%

G: gentamicin; V: vancomycin; C: clindamycin; A: aztreonam; T: tobramycin; MAX: maximum; MIN: minimum; MIC: minimal inhibitory concentration; n.r.: not reported.