Review Article
Systematic Review of Appropriate Robotic Intervention for Gait Function in Subacute Stroke Patients
Table 1
Scores of methodological quality assessment of the included studies.
| | PEDro | Hesse et al., 2012 [15] | Morone et al., 2012 [16] | Chang et al., 2012 [3] | Dragin et al., 2014 [4] | Van Nunen et al., 2015 [17] | Ochi et al., 2015 [18] | Taveggia et al., 2016 [19] | | Randomized controlled trial | Randomized controlled trial | Randomized controlled trial | Randomized controlled trial | Randomized controlled trial | Randomized controlled trial | Randomized controlled trial |
| | Eligibility | Y | N | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | | Randomized allocation | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | | Concealed allocation | N | Y | Y | N | N | Y | Y | | Baseline comparability | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | | Blinded subject | N | N | N | N | N | Y | N | | Blinded therapists | N | N | N | N | N | N | Y | | Blinded raters | Y | N | Y | N | N | Y | Y | | Key outcomes | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | | Intention to treat | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | | Comparison between groups | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | | Precision and variability | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | | ā | 8/11 | 7/11 | 9/11 | 7/11 | 7/11 | 10/11 | 10/11 |
|
|
Y: yes. N: no.
|